Author
Message
romano
Riemann Hypothesis
Offline Joined: 10 Jun 2004 Posts: 304
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
general form of the old ineq
Let , .
Prove that : for all
_________________ No war
Posted: Sun Jan 30, 2005 8:19 am
blahblahblah
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer
Offline Joined: 28 Mar 2004 Posts: 3760
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
It doesn't hold for ;
is not generally true. I think we at least need .
Posted: Sun Jan 30, 2005 10:13 pm
Myth
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer
Offline Joined: 02 Sep 2003 Posts: 4490 Location: Chelyabinsk, Russia
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
No we no need it, since inequalities for and are the same
Forget about
_________________ Myth is out of here
Posted: Sun Jan 30, 2005 10:48 pm
romano
Riemann Hypothesis
Offline Joined: 10 Jun 2004 Posts: 304
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Anybody , let's try to solve it !
_________________ No war
Posted: Mon Jan 31, 2005 8:21 am
zhaobin
Navier-Stokes Equations
Offline Joined: 11 Jan 2005 Posts: 2229 Location: China Zhejiang province Ningbo
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Myth wrote:
No we no need it, since inequalities for and are the same
Forget about
I don't think it is the same.please think about it again.
Posted: Mon Jan 31, 2005 8:41 am
Myth
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer
Offline Joined: 02 Sep 2003 Posts: 4490 Location: Chelyabinsk, Russia
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
No, I am right
_________________ Myth is out of here
Posted: Mon Jan 31, 2005 8:43 am
zhaobin
Navier-Stokes Equations
Offline Joined: 11 Jan 2005 Posts: 2229 Location: China Zhejiang province Ningbo
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
yes I'm sorry
Posted: Mon Jan 31, 2005 8:46 am
romano
Riemann Hypothesis
Offline Joined: 10 Jun 2004 Posts: 304
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
For more understoodable explanation : We need to show that :
_________________ No war
Posted: Mon Jan 31, 2005 8:50 am
zhaobin
Navier-Stokes Equations
Offline Joined: 11 Jan 2005 Posts: 2229 Location: China Zhejiang province Ningbo
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
assume t>1 can we let
can we prove that ?
Posted: Mon Jan 31, 2005 11:28 am
romano
Riemann Hypothesis
Offline Joined: 10 Jun 2004 Posts: 304
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Ican't prove
How can you do with
In short , this problem is still unsolved !
_________________ No war
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2005 8:40 am
Display posts from previous: All Posts 1 Day 7 Days 2 Weeks 1 Month 3 Months 6 Months 1 Year Sort by: Post Time Post Subject Author Ascending Descending