Author
Message
h_s_potter2002
Navier-Stokes Equations
Offline Joined: 01 Jul 2004 Posts: 1334
Square Roots
Symplify .
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2005 6:08 pm
shinwoo
Yang-Mills Theory
Offline Joined: 30 Oct 2004 Posts: 707
I'm giving you the hint because I would like all the people to try it...
the hint is ....
think squre root as 1/2 power
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2005 6:56 pm
SoccerBrainy40
Hodge Conjecture
Offline Joined: 12 Dec 2004 Posts: 69
From doing the first chapter of AOPS V1, I think I know this...
The square root is the same as to the 1/2 power, as shinwoo said.
So then, you have x (3)(1/2) , which simplifies to x 3/2 .
Posted: Fri Feb 04, 2005 1:46 pm
Treething
Navier-Stokes Equations
Offline Joined: 24 Oct 2004 Posts: 2188 Location: HEY LOOK A FREE TITLE
3/2 * 2 = 3
_________________everybody loves junggi:
dude how can you even THINK that kim jong il would lose?
HE'S LIKE CHUCK NORRIS OF THE EAST
Posted: Fri Feb 04, 2005 2:05 pm
dwx314
Riemann Hypothesis
Offline Joined: 03 Nov 2004 Posts: 462 Location: New Hampshire, USA
This means the square root of x to the power of 3,
square root of x= x^1/2
Cube of x=x^3
x^((3)(1/2))
x^(3/2)
>> <<
_________________ -=>David X.<=-
Phillips Exeter Academy Class of '10
"There are 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand binary and those who don't." -Some guy I don't remember
Posted: Sat Feb 05, 2005 5:15 am
JBL
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer
Offline Joined: 04 Jul 2003 Posts: 8752 Location: Brooklyn, NY or Cambridge, MA
dwx -- the ^ and _ commands only affect the immediate next character, unless you enclose things in brackets. Thus, you meant to write
x^{3/2}, not x^3/2. .
_________________Joel
Hi Deeps! <3
Posted: Sat Feb 05, 2005 9:10 am
shinwoo
Yang-Mills Theory
Offline Joined: 30 Oct 2004 Posts: 707
yeah....
the way you wrote means totally different stuff....
LaTeX could be really confusing..
Posted: Sat Feb 05, 2005 9:31 am
Mamat
Poincare Conjecture
Offline Joined: 26 Sep 2004 Posts: 189
:sqrt: x :^3: =x* :sqrt: x=x^(3/2)
Posted: Sat Feb 05, 2005 2:50 pm
metsfan001
P versus NP
Offline Joined: 12 Feb 2005 Posts: 38 Location: Manhattan
Actually, you are all wrong. That is not a simplified radical; that is just turning a radical into a power. Therefore, the answer is .
_________________ 2005 Manhattan MATHCOUNTS Chapter Countdown Champ!
Posted: Sun Feb 13, 2005 3:43 pm
h_s_potter2002
Navier-Stokes Equations
Offline Joined: 01 Jul 2004 Posts: 1334
I was trying to get metsfan001's answer, but I guess you could consider the rest of your guy's answers correct too.
Posted: Sun Feb 13, 2005 4:26 pm
Resherry
New Member
Offline Joined: 18 Feb 2005 Posts: 1
Mamat wrote:
:sqrt: x :^3: =x* :sqrt: x=x^(3/2)
How could you tell "x>0"?
_________________ NONE
Posted: Fri Feb 18, 2005 9:47 pm
jli
Navier-Stokes Equations
Offline Joined: 17 Nov 2004 Posts: 2234 Location: cali
Posted: Fri Feb 18, 2005 11:34 pm
DarkKnight
Yang-Mills Theory
Offline Joined: 29 Feb 2004 Posts: 630 Location: Washington State
X^3/2
Posted: Sat Feb 19, 2005 10:04 am
dk2
Poincare Conjecture
Offline Joined: 10 Jun 2003 Posts: 185 Location: Toronto
Extension:
a) Simplify (exponential form is okay)
b) Simplify
c) <Removed by moderator rcv. Too challenging for this forum.>
Posted: Sat Feb 19, 2005 6:57 pm
jli
Navier-Stokes Equations
Offline Joined: 17 Nov 2004 Posts: 2234 Location: cali
dk2 wrote:
Extension:
a) Simplify (exponential form is okay)
b) Simplify
Posted: Sat Feb 19, 2005 7:04 pm
rcv
Yang-Mills Theory
Offline Joined: 27 Jun 2003 Posts: 915 Location: Colorado
jli wrote:
It would be more helpful to others, if you would show your work. (Especially on a problem that's especially challenging for this forum.) I believe your answer to part a is correct, but your answer to part b is incorrect.
Posted: Sun Feb 20, 2005 9:04 am
jli
Navier-Stokes Equations
Offline Joined: 17 Nov 2004 Posts: 2234 Location: cali
rcv wrote:
jli wrote:
It would be more helpful to others, if you would show your work. (Especially on a problem that's especially challenging for this forum.) I believe your answer to part a is correct, but your answer to part b is incorrect.
sorry
Posted: Sun Feb 20, 2005 11:27 pm
jli
Navier-Stokes Equations
Offline Joined: 17 Nov 2004 Posts: 2234 Location: cali
oops. must have did something wrong the first time
Posted: Sun Feb 20, 2005 11:28 pm
math92
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer
Offline Joined: 10 Apr 2005 Posts: 2832 Location: Baltimore, MD
x^(3/2)
x^(3/4)
Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2005 2:34 pm
mathgeek2006
Yang-Mills Theory
Offline Joined: 19 Mar 2005 Posts: 506 Location: Utah
x3/2
Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2005 9:41 pm
Display posts from previous: All Posts 1 Day 7 Days 2 Weeks 1 Month 3 Months 6 Months 1 Year Sort by: Post Time Post Subject Author Ascending Descending