Author
Message
perfect_radio
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer
Offline Joined: 04 Feb 2005 Posts: 2614 Location: Bucharest
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
an utterly inappropriate question sick mind
Let be a sequence of real numbers s.t. , . Also consider .
Is it true that ?
If it turns out not to be true, then a counter-example would be appreciated Or some sufficient conditions...
Again, sorry if this question is the dumbest ever posted here
_________________ "Germany has offered to send troops to the Lebanon border. I bet Israel's breathing a sigh of relief there. Nothing makes Jewish people feel safer and more secure than the German Army marching on their border."
Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2005 2:40 pm
Arne
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer
Offline Joined: 07 Sep 2003 Posts: 3694 Location: Belgium
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
We have So that's a nice counterexample.
Obviously we can also use the following example:
but that one is less spectacular, in my opinion
Intuitively it should be obvious that the limit doesn't need to be , I can easily explain why: define for all . Then but the only restrictions on the numbers is that they must be positive (since the are all bigger than 1). But it is obvious that an infinite sum of positive reals doesn't need to be infinite - think of geometric series with ratio smaller than 1, for example. So, take your sequence such that the limit is finite, then will be finite, and hence will be finite too.
Last edited by Arne on Mon Sep 19, 2005 5:43 am; edited 1 time in total
Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2005 2:54 pm
perfect_radio
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer
Offline Joined: 04 Feb 2005 Posts: 2614 Location: Bucharest
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
i thought about this while trying to solve a bloody (for me) problem (in which the product diverges).
i also tried (for that problem) taking logarithms but came up empty-handed
The problem was:
Find
_________________ "Germany has offered to send troops to the Lebanon border. I bet Israel's breathing a sigh of relief there. Nothing makes Jewish people feel safer and more secure than the German Army marching on their border."
Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2005 12:21 am
Arne
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer
Offline Joined: 07 Sep 2003 Posts: 3694 Location: Belgium
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Well, in that case, the limit is indeed.
A proof? Well, if are positive reals then, for any ,
Now, take . Then the left hand side is exactly the given product.
Now, we get
The latter sum is and it is well known that the harmonic series diverges.
Hence, the sum must diverge as well, and hence the limit must be .
Last edited by Arne on Mon Sep 19, 2005 12:41 am; edited 2 times in total
Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2005 12:24 am
perfect_radio
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer
Offline Joined: 04 Feb 2005 Posts: 2614 Location: Bucharest
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Arne wrote:
Well, in that case, the limit is indeed.
I know that, but a proof would be more appreciated. I've been struggling with it for a few days
[EDIT:] Thanks for the proof. It is very nice
_________________ "Germany has offered to send troops to the Lebanon border. I bet Israel's breathing a sigh of relief there. Nothing makes Jewish people feel safer and more secure than the German Army marching on their border."
Last edited by perfect_radio on Mon Sep 19, 2005 1:09 am; edited 1 time in total
Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2005 12:27 am
perfect_radio
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer
Offline Joined: 04 Feb 2005 Posts: 2614 Location: Bucharest
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
My teacher solved it in two ways:
Very similar to yours; it start with the same trick and then used the following generalization: diverges for . The proof is a lot like yours: take s.t. . it is clear that , for all . Thus, our sum is , which famously diverges.
We have , which is true for all . Therefore .
The inequality is true for all . Thus, . Multiply this inequality by to obtain , so . In a similar manner, .
My solution for the divergence of :
A more natural integral based approach works for estimating , but it's not that accurate.
We have
We also have Therefore . Can these estimates be sharpened? (the lower bound can as seen above, but what about the upper one)
Furthermore, can this approach be used for the problem with to find some bounds? I tried that before seeing any solution to this problem and I didn't succeed.
_________________ "Germany has offered to send troops to the Lebanon border. I bet Israel's breathing a sigh of relief there. Nothing makes Jewish people feel safer and more secure than the German Army marching on their border."
Last edited by perfect_radio on Tue Sep 20, 2005 12:01 am; edited 9 times in total
Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2005 10:28 am
Kent Merryfield
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer
Offline Joined: 11 Jun 2004 Posts: 11213 Location: Long Beach, CA
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
If the terms are all eventually of the same sign, then
converges if and only if
converges.
For a proof, take the logarithm of the product.
In your case, and the series diverges by comparison to the harmonic series.
Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2005 10:55 am
perfect_radio
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer
Offline Joined: 04 Feb 2005 Posts: 2614 Location: Bucharest
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
I think (but can't prove) that is increasing.
This implies , with .
Can a similar approximation be found for ?
_________________ "Germany has offered to send troops to the Lebanon border. I bet Israel's breathing a sigh of relief there. Nothing makes Jewish people feel safer and more secure than the German Army marching on their border."
Last edited by perfect_radio on Mon Sep 19, 2005 11:52 pm; edited 1 time in total
Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2005 11:29 am
Kent Merryfield
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer
Offline Joined: 11 Jun 2004 Posts: 11213 Location: Long Beach, CA
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
First approximation:
From , we should get, more or less,
(in some loose sense of approximation).
So trying to compare to is the direction you should be looking.
Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:06 pm
perfect_radio
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer
Offline Joined: 04 Feb 2005 Posts: 2614 Location: Bucharest
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Applying your approach to the other product would yield Checking with a C++ program, the constant seems to be .
I'm just wondering... Is what you wrote sufficient to prove the product grows in the same manner as ?
_________________ "Germany has offered to send troops to the Lebanon border. I bet Israel's breathing a sigh of relief there. Nothing makes Jewish people feel safer and more secure than the German Army marching on their border."
Last edited by perfect_radio on Mon Dec 12, 2005 10:57 am; edited 1 time in total
Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2005 12:11 am
Matnomi
Hodge Conjecture
Offline Joined: 16 Aug 2005 Posts: 64
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Kent Merryfield wrote:
If the terms are all eventually of the same sign, then
converges if and only if
converges.
For a proof, take the logarithm of the product.
And inequalities for , right ?
(for )
Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2005 12:12 am
perfect_radio
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer
Offline Joined: 04 Feb 2005 Posts: 2614 Location: Bucharest
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Arne wrote:
We have So that's a nice counterexample.
how do you prove that? it looks very nice...
_________________ "Germany has offered to send troops to the Lebanon border. I bet Israel's breathing a sigh of relief there. Nothing makes Jewish people feel safer and more secure than the German Army marching on their border."
Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2005 11:51 am
Arne
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer
Offline Joined: 07 Sep 2003 Posts: 3694 Location: Belgium
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
There are two ways I know of. The first one: expand the product, you get a 1 and a sum of terms of the form . Now think about binary representation of positive integers and conclude that the product is exactly .
Alternatively, you could use the fact that and then you get a telescoping product.
Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2005 3:53 pm
perfect_radio
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer
Offline Joined: 04 Feb 2005 Posts: 2614 Location: Bucharest
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
both solutions are . thanks Arne
_________________ "Germany has offered to send troops to the Lebanon border. I bet Israel's breathing a sigh of relief there. Nothing makes Jewish people feel safer and more secure than the German Army marching on their border."
Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2005 1:04 am
Display posts from previous: All Posts 1 Day 7 Days 2 Weeks 1 Month 3 Months 6 Months 1 Year Sort by: Post Time Post Subject Author Ascending Descending