Community

Try our innovative online adaptive learning system, Alcumus.
Over 1100 problems and 60+ video lessons. FREE!
Login Register Memberlist Search AoPS Blogs Contests Galleries Forum Index
The time now is Sun Nov 08, 2009 5:49 pm
All times are UTC - 8
View posts since last visit
View unanswered posts
Integer-valued polynomials
Moderators: High School Olympiad Moderators, amfulger, Arne, darij grinberg, freemind, harazi, Megus, N.T.TUAN, orl, pbornsztein, ZetaX
Post new topic   Reply to topic View previous topicView next topic
5 Posts • Page 1 of 1
Author Message
vess
Yang-Mills Theory
Yang-Mills Theory

Offline
Joined: 10 May 2004
Posts: 724
Location: Cambridge, MA
Bulgaria

To rate posts you must be logged in
#1
Integer-valued polynomials
2004 Bulgarian TST --- Problem 1.

Let n be a positive integer. Determine all positive integers m \in \mathbb{N} for which there exists an integer polynomial
f(x) = a_nx^n + a_{n-1}x^{n-1} + \cdots + a_1x + a_0 \in \mathbb{Z}[x]
such that a_n \neq 0, \mathrm{gcd} \, (a_0,a_1,\ldots,a_n,m) = 1, and f(k) is divisible by m for all integers k \in \mathbb{N}.

PostPosted: Thu May 27, 2004 4:28 am  Back to top 
  ProfilePM
harazi
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer

Offline
Joined: 12 Nov 2003
Posts: 5493
Location: Paris
RomaniaFrance

To rate posts you must be logged in
#2
A beautiful problem!!!!!!!!! I think m must divide n!. In this case the polinomial f(X)=X(X-1)(X-2)...(X-n+1) solves the problem.

Now, suppose we have such a polynomial and take a prime p which divides m.
We have p| a_0+a_1\cdot k+...+a_n\cdot k^n for any k=\overline{1,n+1}. Consider this in \mathbb{Z}_p as a linear system in a_0,...,a_n. The determinant, which is a Vandermonde one must be 0 in \mathbb{Z}_p. This means that p must divide a number of the form i-j, so p is at most n.
Now take any prime p smaller than n and suppose that its exponent in m is more than the exponent in n!. We have obviously \frac{f(X)}{m}=b_0+b_1\cdot X+...+b_n\cdot\frac{x(x-1)...(x-n+1)}{n!} for certain b_0,...,b_n. We easily deduce now that b_i are integers, thus we can write \frac{f(X)}{m}=\frac{c_0+...+c_n\cdot x^n}{n!} for certain c_i integers. But since a_i=\frac{m}{n!}\cdot c_i we must have p|a_i and of course p|m. This is a contradiction.

PostPosted: Thu May 27, 2004 5:09 am  Back to top 
  ProfilePM
zhaobin
Navier-Stokes Equations
Navier-Stokes Equations

Offline
Joined: 11 Jan 2005
Posts: 2229
Location: China Zhejiang province Ningbo
China

To rate posts you must be logged in
#3
I don't understand harazi's solution.can anyone explain it better?

PostPosted: Mon Feb 21, 2005 2:23 am  Back to top 
  ProfilePM
ZetaX
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer


Offline
Joined: 21 Dec 2004
Posts: 6115
Location: München
Germany

To rate posts you must be logged in
#4
I don't think m|n for sure: m=2 , n=3, f(x)=x^3+x^2.
_________________
The one and only place to get next year's IMO problems already now!

PostPosted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 6:42 am  Back to top 
  ProfilePMWWW
keira_khtn
Riemann Hypothesis
Riemann Hypothesis


Offline
Joined: 14 Jan 2005
Posts: 487
Location: Thai Binh Thien Quoc
Viet Nam

To rate posts you must be logged in
#5
He meant m devides (n!). Very nice solution ! However, I dont think Vandermonde's matrix is acceptable in a TST. Therefore, how could you deduce p can't exceed n without resorting to it, Harazi! Shocked
_________________
Utada Hikaru

PostPosted: Tue Mar 03, 2009 5:52 pm  Back to top 
  ProfilePMYMBlog
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
5 Posts • Page 1 of 1
Post new topic   Reply to topic View previous topicView next topic
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum


© Copyright 2008 AoPS Incorporated. All Rights Reserved. • FoundationPrivacyContact Us