Community

Looking for a challenging geometry text? Preparing for MATHCOUNTS or the AMC exams? Check out Art of Problem Solving's Introduction to Geometry by Richard Rusczyk.
Login Register Memberlist Search AoPS Blogs Contests Galleries Forum Index
The time now is Fri Dec 04, 2009 11:50 am
All times are UTC - 8
View posts since last visit
View unanswered posts
lebesgue integral problem 2
Moderators: College Playground Moderators
Post new topic   Reply to topic View previous topicView next topic
6 Posts • Page 1 of 1
Author Message
liyi
Navier-Stokes Equations
Navier-Stokes Equations

Offline
Joined: 17 Jul 2003
Posts: 1630
Location: Foochow, Fukien
China

To rate posts you must be logged in
#1
lebesgue integral problem 2
textbook

f:[0,1]\to[1,\infty) is a measurable function.
Show that
\left(\int_{[0,1]} f(x)dx\right)\left(\int_{[0,1]} \ln f(x)dx\right) \leq \left(\int_{[0,1]} f(x) \ln f(x)dx\right)

PostPosted: Sun Dec 26, 2004 5:59 pm  Back to top 
  ProfilePMMSN
dickchimney
Poincare Conjecture
Poincare Conjecture

Offline
Joined: 06 Mar 2004
Posts: 218

To rate posts you must be logged in
#2
Re: lebesgue integral problem 2
textbook

liyi wrote:
f:[0,1]\to[1,\infty) is a measurable function.
Show that
\left(\int_{[0,1]} f(x)dx\right)\left(\int_{[0,1]} \ln f(x)dx\right) \leq \left(\int_{[0,1]} f(x) \ln f(x)dx\right)


Using Jensen inequality for convex ( and concave ) functions , this problem seems to be quite straightforward.


\int_{[0,1]} f(x) \ln f(x)dx \geq \left(\int_{[0,1]} f(x)dx\right)\ln \left(\int_{[0,1]}f(x)dx\right) \geq \left(\int_{[0,1]}...

The first inequality is due to u\ln u is convex, the second is due to \ln u is concave

Isn't it??

PostPosted: Mon Dec 27, 2004 3:25 am  Back to top 
  ProfilePMBlog
Kent Merryfield
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer

Offline
Joined: 11 Jun 2004
Posts: 11420
Location: Long Beach, CA
United States

To rate posts you must be logged in
#3
Yes. dickchimney's proof is completely correct, and shows that the original stipulation on the range of f could be weakened to f:[0,1]\to(0,\infty), as long as all of the integrals in dickchimney's proof converge absolutely.

PostPosted: Mon Dec 27, 2004 8:35 am  Back to top 
  ProfilePM
liyi
Navier-Stokes Equations
Navier-Stokes Equations

Offline
Joined: 17 Jul 2003
Posts: 1630
Location: Foochow, Fukien
China

To rate posts you must be logged in
#4
Re: lebesgue integral problem 2
textbook

[quote="dickchimney]
\left(\int_{[0,1]} f(x)dx\right)\ln \left(\int_{[0,1]}f(x)dx\right) \geq \left(\int_{[0,1]} f(x)dx\right)\left(\int_{[0,1]} \...
[/quote]
How to obtain this?

PostPosted: Tue Dec 28, 2004 6:15 pm  Back to top 
  ProfilePMMSN
grobber
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer

Offline
Joined: 07 Apr 2003
Posts: 7862
Location: Romania
Romania

To rate posts you must be logged in
#5
I think he did mention that it follows from the concavity of \ln.

PostPosted: Tue Dec 28, 2004 6:23 pm  Back to top 
  ProfilePM
liyi
Navier-Stokes Equations
Navier-Stokes Equations

Offline
Joined: 17 Jul 2003
Posts: 1630
Location: Foochow, Fukien
China

To rate posts you must be logged in
#6
thanks.
i realized it soon after posting it....
//shamed

PostPosted: Tue Dec 28, 2004 6:25 pm  Back to top 
  ProfilePMMSN
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
6 Posts • Page 1 of 1
Post new topic   Reply to topic View previous topicView next topic
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum


© Copyright 2008 AoPS Incorporated. All Rights Reserved. • FoundationPrivacyContact Us