Author
Message
h_s_potter2002
Navier-Stokes Equations
Offline Joined: 01 Jul 2004 Posts: 1342
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Square Roots
Symplify .
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2005 5:08 pm
shinwoo
Yang-Mills Theory
Offline Joined: 30 Oct 2004 Posts: 702
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
hint I'm giving you the hint because I would like all the people to try it...
the hint is ....
think squre root as 1/2 power
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2005 5:56 pm
SoccerBrainy40
Hodge Conjecture
Offline Joined: 12 Dec 2004 Posts: 69
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
From doing the first chapter of AOPS V1, I think I know this...
Click to reveal hidden content
The square root is the same as to the 1/2 power, as shinwoo said.
So then, you have x (3)(1/2) , which simplifies to x 3/2 .
Posted: Fri Feb 04, 2005 12:46 pm
Treething
Navier-Stokes Equations
Offline Joined: 24 Oct 2004 Posts: 2184 Location: HEY LOOK A FREE TITLE
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
hint
3/2 * 2 = 3
_________________everybody loves junggi:
dude how can you even THINK that kim jong il would lose?
HE'S LIKE CHUCK NORRIS OF THE EAST
Posted: Fri Feb 04, 2005 1:05 pm
dwx314
Riemann Hypothesis
Offline Joined: 03 Nov 2004 Posts: 464 Location: New Hampshire, USA
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Click to reveal hidden content This means the square root of x to the power of 3,
square root of x= x^1/2
Cube of x=x^3
x^((3)(1/2))
x^(3/2)
>>
<<
Posted: Sat Feb 05, 2005 4:15 am
JBL
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer
Offline Joined: 04 Jul 2003 Posts: 10781 Location: Brooklyn, NY or Cambridge, MA
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
dwx -- the ^ and _ commands only affect the immediate next character, unless you enclose things in brackets. Thus, you meant to write Click to reveal hidden content x^{3/2}, not x^3/2.
.
_________________Joel
Hi Deeps! <3
Posted: Sat Feb 05, 2005 8:10 am
shinwoo
Yang-Mills Theory
Offline Joined: 30 Oct 2004 Posts: 702
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
yeah....
the way you wrote means totally different stuff....
LaTeX could be really confusing..
Posted: Sat Feb 05, 2005 8:31 am
Mamat
Poincare Conjecture
Offline Joined: 26 Sep 2004 Posts: 189
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
:sqrt: x :^3: =x* :sqrt: x=x^(3/2)
Posted: Sat Feb 05, 2005 1:50 pm
metsfan001
P versus NP
Offline Joined: 12 Feb 2005 Posts: 38 Location: Manhattan
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Click to reveal hidden content
Actually, you are all wrong. That is not a simplified radical; that is just turning a radical into a power. Therefore, the answer is
.
_________________ 2005 Manhattan MATHCOUNTS Chapter Countdown Champ!
Posted: Sun Feb 13, 2005 2:43 pm
h_s_potter2002
Navier-Stokes Equations
Offline Joined: 01 Jul 2004 Posts: 1342
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
I was trying to get metsfan001's answer, but I guess you could consider the rest of your guy's answers correct too.
Posted: Sun Feb 13, 2005 3:26 pm
Resherry
New Member
Offline Joined: 18 Feb 2005 Posts: 1
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Mamat wrote:
:sqrt: x :^3: =x* :sqrt: x=x^(3/2)
How could you tell "x>0"?
_________________ NONE
Posted: Fri Feb 18, 2005 8:47 pm
jli
Navier-Stokes Equations
Offline Joined: 17 Nov 2004 Posts: 2341 Location: california
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
solution
Posted: Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:34 pm
DarkKnight
Yang-Mills Theory
Offline Joined: 29 Feb 2004 Posts: 641 Location: Washington State
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Click to reveal hidden content
X^3/2
Posted: Sat Feb 19, 2005 9:04 am
dk2
Poincare Conjecture
Offline Joined: 10 Jun 2003 Posts: 185 Location: Toronto
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Extension:
a) Simplify (exponential form is okay)
b) Simplify
c) <Removed by moderator rcv. Too challenging for this forum.>
Posted: Sat Feb 19, 2005 5:57 pm
jli
Navier-Stokes Equations
Offline Joined: 17 Nov 2004 Posts: 2341 Location: california
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
dk2 wrote:
Extension:
a) Simplify (exponential form is okay)
b) Simplify
a
b
Posted: Sat Feb 19, 2005 6:04 pm
rcv
Yang-Mills Theory
Offline Joined: 27 Jun 2003 Posts: 920 Location: Colorado
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
It would be more helpful to others, if you would show your work. (Especially on a problem that's especially challenging for this forum.) I believe your answer to part a is correct, but your answer to part b is incorrect.
Posted: Sun Feb 20, 2005 8:04 am
jli
Navier-Stokes Equations
Offline Joined: 17 Nov 2004 Posts: 2341 Location: california
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
rcv wrote:
It would be more helpful to others, if you would show your work. (Especially on a problem that's especially challenging for this forum.) I believe your answer to part a is correct, but your answer to part b is incorrect.
sorry
somethng you need to know
Posted: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:27 pm
jli
Navier-Stokes Equations
Offline Joined: 17 Nov 2004 Posts: 2341 Location: california
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
oops. must have did something wrong the first time
Posted: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:28 pm
math92
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer
Offline Joined: 10 Apr 2005 Posts: 2884 Location: Baltimore, MD
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
original problem x^(3/2)
a x^(3/4)
Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2005 1:34 pm
mathgeek2006
Yang-Mills Theory
Offline Joined: 19 Mar 2005 Posts: 510 Location: Utah
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Click to reveal hidden content x3/2
Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2005 8:41 pm
Display posts from previous: All Posts 1 Day 7 Days 2 Weeks 1 Month 3 Months 6 Months 1 Year Sort by: Post Time Post Subject Author Ascending Descending