|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 8 posts ] |
|
Share:
|
| Author |
Message |
Concyclicboy
Posts: 27 Location: República Independiente de Antiguo Cuscatlan
|
Posted: Oct 07, 2009, 3:19 pm •
# 1
\item Two circles  and  intersect at points  and  . Consider a circle  contained in  and  , which is tangent to both of them at  and  respectively. Let  be one of the intersection points of line  with  ,  be the intersection of line  with  and  be the intersection of line  with  . Let  and  be the intersection points of line  with  and  respectively. Prove that  ,  ,  and  are on the same circle.
|
|
|
livetolove212
Posts: 598 Location: Hanoi
|
Posted: Oct 08, 2009, 4:12 am •
# 2
Construct a tangency  of  and  then  thus
Similarly,
But  then  is cyclic
Therefore  , which follows that  are concyclic.
_________________ Geometry makes me stronger.
|
|
|
luisgeometria
Posts: 1487 Location: Venezuela
|
Posted: Oct 09, 2009, 4:32 pm •
# 3
The inversion with center  and power  takes  and  into themselves and  into a common external tangent  to  are the contact points of  with  . Since  is internally/externally tangent to  and  because both cases hold , it follows that  are inverse points through a positive inversion  that maps  , hence  are inverse points and so are  obviously, thus  are concyclic.
_________________ Platón said: "Nobody untrained in geometry may enter my house"
|
|
|
jayme
Posts: 1019
|
Posted: Oct 09, 2009, 10:06 pm •
# 4
Dear Mathlinkers,
I can not resist to applied my favourite theorem..
1. Let (0) be the initial circle, (1) the one tangent at D, (2) the one tangent at E.
2. Let (3) the circle passing through D, G, E.
3. According to Monge or d'Alembert's theorem, it goes through F.
4. By Reim's theorem applied to (0) and (1), IF//DC
5. By a converse of the pivot theorem applied to (0), (1) and (3), GF is tangent to (1) at G
6. By a converse of Reim's theorem applied to (1) with IF//DG, F, G, H, I are cocyclics.
Sincerely
Jean-Louis
|
|
|
Moonmathpi496
Posts: 412 Location: Bangladesh
Blog: View Blog
|
Posted: Nov 23, 2009, 9:57 am •
# 5
Concyclicboy wrote: \item Two circles  and  intersect at points  and  . Consider a circle  contained in  and  , which is tangent to both of them at  and  respectively. Let  be one of the intersection points of line  with  ,  be the intersection of line  with  and  be the intersection of line  with  . Let  and  be the intersection points of line  with  and  respectively. Prove that  ,  ,  and  are on the same circle.
It is enough to prove that  .
 is is a cyclic quadrilateral, as  So,
We know that a homothety with center  maps  . So,  , and for the same reason  .
We have,  , and  .
Q.E.D.
_________________
"Inspiration is needed in geometry, just as much as in poetry." -- Aleksandr Pushkin
|
|
|
diegu
Posts: 11
|
Posted: Dec 04, 2009, 12:53 pm •
# 6
livetolove212 wrote: Construct a tangency  of  and  then  thus  Similarly,  But  then  is cyclic Therefore  , which follows that  are concyclic.
why if  then  is cyclic?
and on the picture where is the tangency  ?
and why  ?
thanks
|
|
|
diegu
Posts: 11
|
Posted: Dec 05, 2009, 4:09 am •
# 7
diegu wrote: livetolove212 wrote: Construct a tangency  of  and  then  thus  Similarly,  But  then  is cyclic Therefore  , which follows that  are concyclic. why if  then  is cyclic? and on the picture where is the tangency  ? and why  ? thanks
please...I don't understand
|
|
|
Joao Pedro Santos
Posts: 94 Location: Portugal-Alcanena/Lisbon
|
Posted: Mar 09, 2010, 1:08 pm •
# 8
diegu wrote: diegu wrote: livetolove212 wrote: Construct a tangency  of  and  then  thus  Similarly,  But  then  is cyclic Therefore  , which follows that  are concyclic. why if  then  is cyclic? and on the picture where is the tangency  ? and why  ? thanks please...I don't understand
The cyclicity of  is a direct consequence of the Power of a Point Theorem's converse...
 is a direct consequence of the Half-Inscribed Angle Theorem...
But I think  is inside  and  , and not the opposite... Anyway, the difficulty is the same.
Here's my solution:
Let  ,  and  be the centers of  ,  and  .
From the tangencies between the circles, we get the colinearities  and  .
Since  lies on the radical axis of  and  , the points  are concyclic.
With some angle chasing, it's easy to see it suffices to prove  .
If we have the colinearity  , it's trivial, since  .
Otherwise it suffices to prove  .
Let  be the reflection of  w.r.t.  .
Let  be the reflection of  w.r.t.  .
It's easy to see ![[DD'E]](http://data.artofproblemsolving.com/images/latex/c/3/d/c3d36e256d5392d04609a258a0355b7e2739d493.gif) and ![[DD''H]](http://data.artofproblemsolving.com/images/latex/f/6/6/f66cb9540f2696a9b98dfbd5aef25f3ebe2161e5.gif) are similar, so we have  , therefore ![[DOE]](http://data.artofproblemsolving.com/images/latex/4/c/5/4c54294fdd4cade4c8e734d699dac1e0e4afe82d.gif) and ![[DO_1H]](http://data.artofproblemsolving.com/images/latex/1/7/c/17c2d433bf9b2d04df7a9b5121756be5e8ad4610.gif) are similar, so  .
Analogously we prove  , so  , QED.
|
|
|
Share:
Moderators: yetti, MithsApprentice, N.T.TUAN, Peter, darij grinberg, orl, pohoatza, pbornsztein, High School Olympiad Moderators
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 8 posts ] |
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
|