Author
Message
bgbgbgbg
Hodge Conjecture
Offline Joined: 17 Sep 2009 Posts: 97
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
find the limit find the limit
find the limit:
lim (sinx)/x as x goes to 0 if x in degrees
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 8:52 pm
tobeno_1
Poincare Conjecture
Offline Joined: 16 Mar 2008 Posts: 131 Location: China
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Re: find the limit find the limit
bgbgbgbg wrote:
find the limit:
lim (sinx)/x as x goes to 0 if x in degrees
Isn't it ?
_________________
Tomorrow is another day...
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 8:59 pm
bgbgbgbg
Hodge Conjecture
Offline Joined: 17 Sep 2009 Posts: 97
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
please
notice that x in degrees not in radian
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 9:16 pm
evoluciona
New Member
Offline Joined: 27 Oct 2009 Posts: 10
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Re: please
bgbgbgbg wrote:
notice that x in degrees not in radian
Make the substitution u = x*2Pi/360. x tends to 0+ iff u tends to 0+. Replace all x's with u.
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 9:22 pm
phymax
Hodge Conjecture
Offline Joined: 15 Mar 2009 Posts: 94 Location: Chennai
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
it doesnt even count much in hyperreals.
Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 7:04 am
mavropnevma
Yang-Mills Theory
Offline Joined: 27 Jun 2009 Posts: 690 Location: Bucharest
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
. It does not matter the unit of measure for , be it radians, degrees (or maybe ).
_________________ Listen to REMBETIKA for decoding the handle.
Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 11:30 pm
shyong
Navier-Stokes Equations
Offline Joined: 24 Jun 2005 Posts: 1618
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
it would makes sense if you could tell what is the meaning of a real number divided by a degree ?
_________________
Life is complex: it has both real and imaginary components
Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2009 12:08 am
jmerry
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer
Offline Joined: 12 Jun 2004 Posts: 7586 Location: Seattle
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Given the level of understanding this question was asked at, the last few posts really don't fit.
There is a perfectly sensible function defined on angles, which can be measured in degrees. Before calculus, degrees are as good as any angle measurement system, and cive us nice numbers for nice angles.
So, now we want to develop the calculus of trigonometric functions. The first crucial limit that comes up is this one: what is . Since we don't know any better, that angle is marked in degrees for now. What is the value of this limit? Some ugly number; if we look closer, it turns out to be .
We don't like that, so we invent an entirely new angle measurement , called the radian. Scaling the angle measurement changes the limit, and for the radian's arclength scaling it turns out to be .
That is the point of radians. From there on, we never use degrees in a calculus setting again.
Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2009 12:35 am
Display posts from previous: All Posts 1 Day 7 Days 2 Weeks 1 Month 3 Months 6 Months 1 Year Sort by: Post Time Post Subject Author Ascending Descending