Community

Art of Problem Solving celebrates the many
accomplishments of its students and community members.
Login Register Memberlist Search AoPS Blogs Contests Galleries Forum Index
The time now is Mon Dec 07, 2009 12:30 pm
All times are UTC - 8
View posts since last visit
View unanswered posts
Extreme value problem
Moderators: College Playground Moderators
Post new topic   Reply to topic View previous topicView next topic
5 Posts • Page 1 of 1
Author Message
Protonics
New Member
New Member

Offline
Joined: 20 Sep 2009
Posts: 12

To rate posts you must be logged in
#1
 Extreme value problem
size of radius

A mirror producer wants to start the production of a new series. The new mirrors has an area of 1 m^2 and are shaped like a rectangle with a semi circle in the left and right ends. There is going to be a frame around the entire mirror, and the crooked part of the frame is twice as expensive pr. square centimeter compared to the straight part. How big must the radius of the semi circles be in order to make the frame as cheap as possible to produce?

Thanks!

PostPosted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 5:27 am  Back to top 
  ProfilePM
Kent Merryfield
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer

Offline
Joined: 11 Jun 2004
Posts: 11467
Location: Long Beach, CA
United States

To rate posts you must be logged in
#2
Re: Extreme value problem
size of radius

Protonics wrote:
the crooked part of the frame is twice as expensive pr. square centimeter compared to the straight part.

This makes no sense. Is the price being quoted per linear centimeter of perimeter?

PostPosted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 12:07 pm  Back to top 
  ProfilePM
Protonics
New Member
New Member

Offline
Joined: 20 Sep 2009
Posts: 12

To rate posts you must be logged in
#3
Yes its perimeter

PostPosted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 1:01 am  Back to top 
  ProfilePM
Protonics
New Member
New Member

Offline
Joined: 20 Sep 2009
Posts: 12

To rate posts you must be logged in
#4
Thanks for your attention, but i managed to solve the problem myself.

PostPosted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 3:58 am  Back to top 
  ProfilePM
Kent Merryfield
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer

Offline
Joined: 11 Jun 2004
Posts: 11467
Location: Long Beach, CA
United States

To rate posts you must be logged in
#5
The setup: let x be the width and y the height, so that the semicircles have radius \frac y2.

The area is A=xy+\frac{\pi}4y^2.

The cost is proportional to C=2x+2\pi y.

The problem: minimize C subject to the constraint A=1.

By Lagrange multipliers:

2=\lambda y

2\pi = \lambda\left(x+\frac{\pi}2y\right).

Put these together to get

2\pi=\frac{2}{y}\left(x+\frac{\pi}2y\right)

\pi y-\frac{\pi}2y=x

x=\frac{\pi}2y.

Put that in the area constraint: \frac{\pi}2y^2+\frac{\pi}4y^2=1.

y=\sqrt{\frac4{3\pi}} and x=\sqrt{\frac{\pi}3}.

This gives a cost of C=2\sqrt{3\pi}.

We still have to check that that's a minimum. Check the extremes. As y\to 0, we get x\to\infty and C\to\infty. At the other end, we can set x=0, getting y=\sqrt{\frac4{\pi}}. That gives a cost of C=4\sqrt{\pi}. Since 4>2\sqrt{3}, the minimum value of C does not occur in the boundary case, so our interior critical point is the minimum.

PostPosted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 8:23 am  Back to top 
  ProfilePM
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
5 Posts • Page 1 of 1
Post new topic   Reply to topic View previous topicView next topic
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum


© Copyright 2008 AoPS Incorporated. All Rights Reserved. • FoundationPrivacyContact Us