Author
Message
dgreenb801
Navier-Stokes Equations
Offline Joined: 08 Sep 2007 Posts: 1239 Location: Florida
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Prime number goes into 1s
Show that for any prime , it goes into the number consisting only of 1s.
For example,
etc.
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 11:49 am
Kouichi Nakagawa
Navier-Stokes Equations
Offline Joined: 16 Feb 2007 Posts: 1238 Location: Japan (日本)
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
is trivial.
is true. Because Fermat's little theorem.
Thus .
_________________
A member of Japan Fibonacci Association
Collection of problems by Kouichi Nakagawa
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 1:13 pm
JBL
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer
Offline Joined: 04 Jul 2003 Posts: 10799 Location: Brooklyn, NY or Cambridge, MA
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
You probably want to think those claims over some more
_________________Joel
Hi Deeps! <3
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 1:45 pm
veezbo
Poincare Conjecture
Offline Joined: 11 Jan 2009 Posts: 216 Location: Ohio
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
BLAH. It took me way too long to solve this problem.
Solution
p-1 1's can be expressed numerically as:
Summing this as a geometric series yields:
We need to show that:
and that x = 0.
Using FLT, we immediately know that
given that p is not 2 or 5 (factors of 10). This is a given, so we can continue.
Because p is prime, it is not divisible by 9. Therefore, x = 0, and it is proved.
_________________
Goals for 2010: Primary Goal = MAKE USAMO (which is now more difficult)
Actually qualify for AIME
AMC12: 132+ AIME: 8+
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 4:18 pm
diophantient
Navier-Stokes Equations
Offline Joined: 08 Mar 2007 Posts: 1023
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
JBL wrote:
You probably want to think those claims over some more
What's wrong with those claims?
_________________ The ninja made a movement.
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 4:55 pm
JBL
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer
Offline Joined: 04 Jul 2003 Posts: 10799 Location: Brooklyn, NY or Cambridge, MA
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
You don't have a problem with the claim that 9 divides a power of 10?
_________________Joel
Hi Deeps! <3
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 5:05 pm
dgreenb801
Navier-Stokes Equations
Offline Joined: 08 Sep 2007 Posts: 1239 Location: Florida
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Of course, he meant .
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 6:40 pm
Kouichi Nakagawa
Navier-Stokes Equations
Offline Joined: 16 Feb 2007 Posts: 1238 Location: Japan (日本)
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Sorry.
I missed words slightly.
As dgreenb801 says definitely; as follows.
is trivial.
is true. Because Fermat's little theorem.
Thus .
_________________
A member of Japan Fibonacci Association
Collection of problems by Kouichi Nakagawa
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 9:20 pm
Display posts from previous: All Posts 1 Day 7 Days 2 Weeks 1 Month 3 Months 6 Months 1 Year Sort by: Post Time Post Subject Author Ascending Descending