Author
Message
isabella2296
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer
Online Joined: 21 Mar 2008 Posts: 6165 Location: Bleh.
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Mock ARML problem
Pretty sure this is the right place to post this (as the forum description mentions ARML.)
I'd like a hint on this problem (not a solution!)
Given that the sum of all positive integers with exactly two proper divisors, each of which is less than 30, is 2397, find the sum of all positive integers with exactly three proper divisors, each of which is less than 30 (a proper divisor of n is a positive integer that divides but is not equal to n).
Thanks!
_________________
Czech out
Latest entry:
Nine-Point Center
Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 9:58 am
darkmage2009
Hodge Conjecture
Offline Joined: 02 Jun 2009 Posts: 50 Location: Augusta, GA
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Is this an individual or a team round question?
Regardless, think about the formula of the number of divisors of an integer. Then you should realize what form an integer with exactly two proper divisors and an integer with exactly three proper divisors would take. Then you do a little algebraic manipulation and arithmetic to find your answer.
_________________ 1+1=2 in base 10, and 1+1=10 in base 2. Coincidence? I think not!
Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 10:24 am
isabella2296
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer
Online Joined: 21 Mar 2008 Posts: 6165 Location: Bleh.
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
darkmage2009 wrote:
Is this an individual or a team round question?
Not sure. Someone showed it to me and said it was from a mock ARML.
Thanks for the hint!
I know an integer with exactly two proper divisors is in the form and an integer with exactly three proper divisors is in the form or , where is a prime factor, but I'm still not sure where to go from there.
Bah, I'll have to give this some more thought.
_________________
Czech out
Latest entry:
Nine-Point Center
Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 5:29 pm
andersonw
Yang-Mills Theory
Offline Joined: 23 Oct 2007 Posts: 617
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
I remember this was from an Altheman mock ARML. Not sure which one, though.
hint
. Now think symmetric sums.
And yes, it requires a lot of computation...
Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 6:16 pm
10000th User
Navier-Stokes Equations
Offline Joined: 04 Jul 2005 Posts: 1721 Location: NJ
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Let me state a fact that would perhaps help some of the unexperienced readers:
Let be the prime factorization of . Then, the number of positive divisors of is .
isabella2296 wrote:
I know an integer with exactly two proper divisors is in the form and an integer with exactly three proper divisors is in the form or , where is a prime factor, but I'm still not sure where to go from there.
Bah, I'll have to give this some more thought.
You're on the right path. Adding the numbers of the first form shouldn't be a problem for you.
For those of the second form
look at the multinomial expansion
. Solve for
. Set up a few bounds on the primes and the rest will be easy. I'm sure you get my idea by now.
_________________
Disclaimer : I'll revive old threads if: 1) something ambiguous in the solution or wrong argument, 2) no solution, 3) I got new insight to input.
Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 9:09 pm
isabella2296
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer
Online Joined: 21 Mar 2008 Posts: 6165 Location: Bleh.
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Yay, I think I got it!
Is the answer 7282?
_________________
Czech out
Latest entry:
Nine-Point Center
Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 4:33 am
10000th User
Navier-Stokes Equations
Offline Joined: 04 Jul 2005 Posts: 1721 Location: NJ
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
isabella2296 wrote:
Yay, I think I got it!
Is the answer 7282?
That's right Here is your prize:
_________________
Disclaimer : I'll revive old threads if: 1) something ambiguous in the solution or wrong argument, 2) no solution, 3) I got new insight to input.
Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 7:05 am
isabella2296
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer
Online Joined: 21 Mar 2008 Posts: 6165 Location: Bleh.
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Thanks for the help, everyone!
_________________
Czech out
Latest entry:
Nine-Point Center
Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 9:42 am
Display posts from previous: All Posts 1 Day 7 Days 2 Weeks 1 Month 3 Months 6 Months 1 Year Sort by: Post Time Post Subject Author Ascending Descending