Author
Message
hasan4444
Riemann Hypothesis
Offline Joined: 28 Nov 2008 Posts: 486
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Tenth Square Root
Find
_________________
New
"Inequalities Marathon" join it now
Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 3:45 am
isabella2296
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer
Offline Joined: 21 Mar 2008 Posts: 6167 Location: Bleh.
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Hmm, isn't it just ? Or am I missing something?
_________________
Czech out
Latest entry:
Morley's Theorem (Proof)
Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 4:28 am
hasan4444
Riemann Hypothesis
Offline Joined: 28 Nov 2008 Posts: 486
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
I think you are right. I don't know if it can be more simplified but I posted a strange solution that I'm sure it's wrong. It goes like this
_________________
New
"Inequalities Marathon" join it now
Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 4:39 am
Arrange your tan
Riemann Hypothesis
Offline Joined: 08 Nov 2007 Posts: 383
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
hasan4444 wrote:
I think you are right. I don't know if it can be more simplified but I posted a strange solution that I'm sure it's wrong. It goes like this
Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 8:32 am
grn_trtle
Navier-Stokes Equations
Offline Joined: 01 Sep 2008 Posts: 1034 Location: California
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
You could use the Binomial Theorem if you really wanted to...
Which is pretty close to the real value, which is slightly above
_________________
Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 8:50 am
fishythefish
Yang-Mills Theory
Offline Joined: 03 Mar 2008 Posts: 822 Location: Unknown, with known velocity
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
It is most definitely not equal to . In fact, there is no way that it's rational. grn_turtle has a good approximation. (Hassan, I believe you meant to say
Here's what I would have done.
, which is what isabella has.
_________________
I am NOBODY. NOBODY is PERFECT. Therefore, I am PERFECT.
There are 3 types of people in the world. Those who can count and those who can't.
ATTENTION ALL CALCOHOLICS!!! Know your limits. Don't drink and derive.
Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 2:29 pm
hasan4444
Riemann Hypothesis
Offline Joined: 28 Nov 2008 Posts: 486
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
I know it's wrong but I state it just to let you know about the answer I saw for this problem.
Thanks a lot
_________________
New
"Inequalities Marathon" join it now
Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 4:33 am
Dr Sonnhard Graubner
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer
Online Joined: 25 Jul 2004 Posts: 2819
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
hello, we get .
Sonnhard.
Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 6:38 am
ernie
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer
Offline Joined: 02 Feb 2008 Posts: 3484 Location: The forgotten state of New England.
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
But this isn't simplified, because there's a radical in the denominator.
_________________
If pro is the opposite of con, then what's the opposite of progress?
Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 7:49 am
grn_trtle
Navier-Stokes Equations
Offline Joined: 01 Sep 2008 Posts: 1034 Location: California
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Uh, I believe the answer here is irrational. You're not going to get any nice answer here. The best you can do, I think, is manipulate the square roots, or use an approximation like I did.
_________________
Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 10:36 am
boohsunil
New Member
Offline Joined: 11 Jul 2009 Posts: 11
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
answer i suppose this must be the answer
Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 4:19 am
10000th User
Navier-Stokes Equations
Offline Joined: 04 Jul 2005 Posts: 1721 Location: NJ
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Re: answer
boohsunil wrote:
Nope, that's incorrect twice. First, that's not how you simplify radicals. Second, that's not how you use implication signs; you should use equality signs.
and that's as much as you can simplify, as noted by previous AoPSers.
_________________
Disclaimer : I'll revive old threads if: 1) something ambiguous in the solution or wrong argument, 2) no solution, 3) I got new insight to input.
Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 7:09 am
Display posts from previous: All Posts 1 Day 7 Days 2 Weeks 1 Month 3 Months 6 Months 1 Year Sort by: Post Time Post Subject Author Ascending Descending