Author
Message
Vasc
Navier-Stokes Equations
Offline Joined: 17 May 2004 Posts: 1871 Location: PLoiesti
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Am-Gm
If , then
.
_________________As to inequalities, the simpler and sharper, the more beautiful!
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 6:17 am
can_hang2007
Navier-Stokes Equations
Offline Joined: 12 Jan 2008 Posts: 1613 Location: Vietnam
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Very nice inequality, Mr Vasile. Please take a look at my proof at: http://canhang2007.wordpress.com/2009/11/05/inequality-48-v-cirtoaje/
_________________The love makes us stronger!
V. Q. B. Can
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 4:32 pm
Vasc
Navier-Stokes Equations
Offline Joined: 17 May 2004 Posts: 1871 Location: PLoiesti
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Very nice your proof, Can_Hang.
_________________As to inequalities, the simpler and sharper, the more beautiful!
Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 2:44 pm
Vasc
Navier-Stokes Equations
Offline Joined: 17 May 2004 Posts: 1871 Location: PLoiesti
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
What about this ?
If , then
.
Notice that the right inequality is sharper that the one above.
_________________As to inequalities, the simpler and sharper, the more beautiful!
Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 3:50 pm
can_hang2007
Navier-Stokes Equations
Offline Joined: 12 Jan 2008 Posts: 1613 Location: Vietnam
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Vasc wrote:
What about this ?
If , then
.
Notice that the right inequality is sharper that the one above.
See my proof here: http://canhang2007.wordpress.com/2009/11/07/inequality-53-v-cirtoaje/
_________________The love makes us stronger!
V. Q. B. Can
Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 4:18 pm
Vasc
Navier-Stokes Equations
Offline Joined: 17 May 2004 Posts: 1871 Location: PLoiesti
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Nice solution, Can_hang.
Note that for the right inequality there is at least another one nice solution (only with AM-GM inequality).
_________________As to inequalities, the simpler and sharper, the more beautiful!
Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 5:11 pm
can_hang2007
Navier-Stokes Equations
Offline Joined: 12 Jan 2008 Posts: 1613 Location: Vietnam
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Vasc wrote:
Nice solution, Can_hang.
Note that for the right inequality there is at least another one nice solution (only with AM-GM inequality).
Dear Mr Vasile,
Please take a look again the link: http://canhang2007.wordpress.com/2009/11/07/inequality-53-v-cirtoaje/ to see my second proof for (b).
_________________The love makes us stronger!
V. Q. B. Can
Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 7:07 pm
Vasc
Navier-Stokes Equations
Offline Joined: 17 May 2004 Posts: 1871 Location: PLoiesti
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Nice proof, Can_hang.
There is still at least another one nice solution.
_________________As to inequalities, the simpler and sharper, the more beautiful!
Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 1:20 am
Vasc
Navier-Stokes Equations
Offline Joined: 17 May 2004 Posts: 1871 Location: PLoiesti
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Vasc wrote:
Nice proof, Can_hang.
There is still at least another one nice solution.
My solution.
Using twice AM-GM inequality, we show that
.
The left inequality reduces to
,
and the right to
Generalization. If , then
.
_________________As to inequalities, the simpler and sharper, the more beautiful!
Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 6:56 am
can_hang2007
Navier-Stokes Equations
Offline Joined: 12 Jan 2008 Posts: 1613 Location: Vietnam
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Vasc wrote:
Vasc wrote:
Nice proof, Can_hang.
There is still at least another one nice solution.
My solution.
Using twice AM-GM inequality, we show that
.
The left inequality reduces to
,
and the right to
Generalization. If , then
.
Your solution is really nice, Mr Vasile.
For your generalization, I found now that you have in your book the following problem:
"Let and let . Prove that
"
According to the result of this problem, we can see that the above generalization is just a direct consequence of it.
_________________The love makes us stronger!
V. Q. B. Can
Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 7:20 am
Vasc
Navier-Stokes Equations
Offline Joined: 17 May 2004 Posts: 1871 Location: PLoiesti
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
can_hang2007 wrote:
Your solution is really nice, Mr Vasile.
For your generalization, I found now that you have in your book the following problem:
"Let and let . Prove that
"
According to the result of this problem, we can see that the above generalization is just a direct consequence of it.
Indeed, this is true.
_________________As to inequalities, the simpler and sharper, the more beautiful!
Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 7:49 am
Vasc
Navier-Stokes Equations
Offline Joined: 17 May 2004 Posts: 1871 Location: PLoiesti
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
The following inequalities are a little harder.
If , then
;
.
_________________As to inequalities, the simpler and sharper, the more beautiful!
Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 8:26 am
can_hang2007
Navier-Stokes Equations
Offline Joined: 12 Jan 2008 Posts: 1613 Location: Vietnam
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Vasc wrote:
The following inequalities are a little harder.
If , then
;
.
Please take a look at my proof here, Mr Vasile: http://canhang2007.wordpress.com/2009/11/08/inequality-57-v-cirtoaje/
_________________The love makes us stronger!
V. Q. B. Can
Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 9:58 am
Vasc
Navier-Stokes Equations
Offline Joined: 17 May 2004 Posts: 1871 Location: PLoiesti
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Nice proofs, Can-Hang.
The following inequalities hold, too.
If , then
;
.
_________________As to inequalities, the simpler and sharper, the more beautiful!
Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 3:00 pm
can_hang2007
Navier-Stokes Equations
Offline Joined: 12 Jan 2008 Posts: 1613 Location: Vietnam
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Vasc wrote:
Nice proofs, Can-Hang.
The following inequalities hold, too.
If , then
;
.
I think (a) follows directly from (b). For (b), we can also prove that the stronger inequality holds
P.s: Actually, I think Mr Vasile meant (b) is my stronger one, but he got somemistakes in his typing.
_________________The love makes us stronger!
V. Q. B. Can
Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 2:46 pm
Vasc
Navier-Stokes Equations
Offline Joined: 17 May 2004 Posts: 1871 Location: PLoiesti
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
can_hang2007 wrote:
Vasc wrote:
The following inequalities hold, too.
If , then
;
.
I think (a) follows directly from (b). For (b), we can also prove that the stronger inequality holds
P.s: Actually, I think Mr Vasile meant (b) is my stronger one, but he got somemistakes in his typing.
You are right, Can, I wanted to post
but I made a print-mistake.
We can generalize this interesting inequality to numbers. For instant, if , then
for .
Can someone find the best such that
for ?
or equivalently,
If and , find the best such that
?
Click to reveal hidden content
_________________As to inequalities, the simpler and sharper, the more beautiful!
Posted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 5:09 am
Potla
Yang-Mills Theory
Offline Joined: 27 Nov 2008 Posts: 517 Location: 22°34' N; 88°30'E
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
can_hang2007 wrote:
EDIT: Flipped and , sorry.
Problem
Solution
We replace , so we are only required to prove that
Since , so it suffices to show that
Using , this equivalents
This is perfectly true, since .
(Edited to fix a huge mistake)
_________________
There is no limited age of learning, man can learn anything anytime.
The Problem Solver's paradise
Posted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 9:51 pm
Vasc
Navier-Stokes Equations
Offline Joined: 17 May 2004 Posts: 1871 Location: PLoiesti
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Nice, Potla.
I wait for a solution in the case .
In addition, the best has a nice formula. We have for .
_________________As to inequalities, the simpler and sharper, the more beautiful!
Posted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 2:26 pm
can_hang2007
Navier-Stokes Equations
Offline Joined: 12 Jan 2008 Posts: 1613 Location: Vietnam
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Vasc wrote:
In addition, the best has a nice formula. We have for .
In my result, I found that is But my proof was too complicated and I am afraid of getting something wrong in my computations. So, I dont wanna post it here. I hope Mr Vasile has an easier proof than mine.
By the way, the case is easy and it has a nice proof. I will post it in some days. Now I am a little busy with my school test.
_________________The love makes us stronger!
V. Q. B. Can
Posted: Thu Nov 12, 2009 1:41 am
Vasc
Navier-Stokes Equations
Offline Joined: 17 May 2004 Posts: 1871 Location: PLoiesti
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
can_hang2007 wrote:
In my result, I found that is But my proof was too complicated and I am afraid of getting something wrong in my computations. So, I dont wanna post it here. I hope Mr Vasile has an easier proof than mine.
Indeed, the best for is for even . My proof uses derivatives, but is not complicated.
_________________As to inequalities, the simpler and sharper, the more beautiful!
Posted: Thu Nov 12, 2009 11:08 am
Display posts from previous: All Posts 1 Day 7 Days 2 Weeks 1 Month 3 Months 6 Months 1 Year Sort by: Post Time Post Subject Author Ascending Descending