Community

Looking for a challenging algebra text? Preparing for MATHCOUNTS or the AMC exams?
Check out Art of Problem Solving's Introduction to Algebra by Richard Rusczyk.
Login Register Memberlist Search AoPS Blogs Contests Galleries Forum Index
The time now is Fri Dec 04, 2009 11:59 am
All times are UTC - 8
View posts since last visit
View unanswered posts
NT Factoring Question
Moderators: High School Basics Moderators
Post new topic   Reply to topic View previous topicView next topic
11 Posts • Page 1 of 1
Author Message
Thunder365
Yang-Mills Theory
Yang-Mills Theory


Online
Joined: 27 Feb 2009
Posts: 526
Location: Michigan
Saint Vincent and the GrenadinesWallis and Futuna

To rate posts you must be logged in
#1
NT Factoring Question

Determine all positive integral solutions to x for which x^4 + x^3 + x^2 + x + 1 yields a perfect square.

This seems really easy, but I cant seem to find the proper factors. I factored it a bit to

(x + 1)^2(x^2 + 1) - x(x^2 + x + 1) and then I dont know what to do.


I also need help solving these general types of problems, so if your solution could be more general rather than specific I would really appreciate it Very Happy
_________________
I'm not dumb. I just have a command of thoroughly useless information. Mr. Green
Goals: AMC8:25| AMC10:138+|AIME:5+| Mandelbrot:Leaderboard| Mathcounts:Make Nats| MMPC part 1:28+, MMPC part 2:16+, top 100=>Michigan ARML B team| USAMTS:Bronze| Make CMO

PostPosted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 3:59 pm  Back to top 
  ProfilePMBlog
t0rajir0u
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer


Offline
Joined: 19 Nov 2005
Posts: 12010
Location: Cambridge, MA
ChinaUnited States

To rate posts you must be logged in
#2
Factoring isn't really the way. Bound it between two polynomials which are perfect squares.
_________________
Annoying Precision (http://qchu.wordpress.com/)

PostPosted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 5:13 pm  Back to top 
  ProfilePMWWWBlog
Ihatepie
Navier-Stokes Equations
Navier-Stokes Equations

Offline
Joined: 25 Oct 2006
Posts: 1896
Location: Southwest, CT

To rate posts you must be logged in
#3
maybe?
The upper bound could be x^{2}+x+1 and the lower one is x^{2}+1 because x^3>x^{2} for a positive integer?

_________________
2010 Goals: ARML-7 AMC10- 144 AMC12- 126 AIME- 8 USAJMO-14?

PostPosted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 5:29 pm  Back to top 
  ProfilePMAIM
t0rajir0u
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer


Offline
Joined: 19 Nov 2005
Posts: 12010
Location: Cambridge, MA
ChinaUnited States

To rate posts you must be logged in
#4
That doesn't quite work. You want the bounds to be different by 1; that's how you can conclude that there are no squares between them.
_________________
Annoying Precision (http://qchu.wordpress.com/)

PostPosted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 5:31 pm  Back to top 
  ProfilePMWWWBlog
Thunder365
Yang-Mills Theory
Yang-Mills Theory


Online
Joined: 27 Feb 2009
Posts: 526
Location: Michigan
Saint Vincent and the GrenadinesWallis and Futuna

To rate posts you must be logged in
#5
Im a complete beginner. What exactly is bounding and how do you do it?
_________________
I'm not dumb. I just have a command of thoroughly useless information. Mr. Green
Goals: AMC8:25| AMC10:138+|AIME:5+| Mandelbrot:Leaderboard| Mathcounts:Make Nats| MMPC part 1:28+, MMPC part 2:16+, top 100=>Michigan ARML B team| USAMTS:Bronze| Make CMO

PostPosted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 7:04 pm  Back to top 
  ProfilePMBlog
Ihatepie
Navier-Stokes Equations
Navier-Stokes Equations

Offline
Joined: 25 Oct 2006
Posts: 1896
Location: Southwest, CT

To rate posts you must be logged in
#6
t0rajir0u wrote:
That doesn't quite work. You want the bounds to be different by 1; that's how you can conclude that there are no squares between them.

O, sorry, I've done these problems before but I forgot that this time.

@thunder The general idea is that you find two polynomials (with integer coefficients,) with one of them 1 greater than the other (ex: x^{2}+3 and x^{2}+4,) They have to be selected such that the smaller polynomial, when squared, is smaller than your target, and the bigger polynomial is bigger. Because there are no perfect squares between two consecutive perfect squares, we can then conclude that the polynomial can't be a perfect square.
_________________
2010 Goals: ARML-7 AMC10- 144 AMC12- 126 AIME- 8 USAJMO-14?

PostPosted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 7:40 pm  Back to top 
  ProfilePMAIM
randomguy64
Poincare Conjecture
Poincare Conjecture

Offline
Joined: 21 Aug 2009
Posts: 124
Location: California

To rate posts you must be logged in
#7
You can't prove it is never a perfect square because x=3 makes the polynomial have a value of 121, obviously a perfect square...

PostPosted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 7:55 pm  Back to top 
  ProfilePM
t0rajir0u
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer


Offline
Joined: 19 Nov 2005
Posts: 12010
Location: Cambridge, MA
ChinaUnited States

To rate posts you must be logged in
#8
The bounds only work for all but finitely many x.
_________________
Annoying Precision (http://qchu.wordpress.com/)

PostPosted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 8:37 pm  Back to top 
  ProfilePMWWWBlog
srinath.r
Riemann Hypothesis
Riemann Hypothesis


Offline
Joined: 12 Feb 2009
Posts: 335
Location: Chennai
India

To rate posts you must be logged in
#9
Here is a complete solution .
I knew this problem before and the mathlinks user Agr_94_math ,had said his beautiful solution to me .
Here it goes
For convenience sake ,let x = n and y = m ,so we have to solve for m \in \mathbb{N} for which
m^{4} + m^{3} + m^{2} + m + 1 is a perfect square .
Consider the expansion of (m^{2} + \frac {m}{2})^{2} = m^{4} + m^{3} + \frac {m^{2}}{4} = m^{4} + m^{3} + m^{2} + m + 1 - (\frac {3m^{2}}{4} + m + 1)
Since the \text{L.H.S} is positive and m is natural ,we have
m^{4} + m^{3} + m^{2} + m + 1 = n^{2} > (m^{2} + \frac {m}{2})^{2} ,since m is natural ,
n > m^{2} + \frac {m}{2}
If m is even ,
n \ge m^{2} + \frac {m}{2} + 1,
Squaring both sides we get
n^{2} \ge n^{2} + \frac {5m^{2}}{4}
\implies 0 \ge \frac {5m^{2}}{4} ,so no solutions in naturals .
If m is odd ,
we have n \ge m^{2} + \frac {m}{2} + \frac {1}{2} ,
again repeating the same step we dont get any solutions in naturals .
_________________
Mathematics is queen of sciences and Number Theory is the queen of mathematics

Blog-Number Theory-The Queen of Mathematics

PostPosted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 10:00 pm  Back to top 
  ProfilePMBlog
randomguy64
Poincare Conjecture
Poincare Conjecture

Offline
Joined: 21 Aug 2009
Posts: 124
Location: California

To rate posts you must be logged in
#10
I'll finish your solution.

In the even case, 5m^2/4=0 has no solutions in naturals, but m^2 /4-m/2 -3/4 has one solution, namely m=3, and hence n=11.

That is the only solution.

PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 3:35 pm  Back to top 
  ProfilePM
Agr_94_Math
Yang-Mills Theory
Yang-Mills Theory

Offline
Joined: 17 Feb 2008
Posts: 716
India

To rate posts you must be logged in
#11
Thank you Srinath for posting the solution.

PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 9:34 pm  Back to top 
  ProfilePMBlog
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
11 Posts • Page 1 of 1
Post new topic   Reply to topic View previous topicView next topic
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum


© Copyright 2008 AoPS Incorporated. All Rights Reserved. • FoundationPrivacyContact Us