Author
Message
Kent Merryfield
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer
Offline Joined: 11 Jun 2004 Posts: 11425 Location: Long Beach, CA
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Big-O and little-o Classroom topic
The attached file is a handout I'm going to give to a class of mine this week. It's a junior-level "real analysis" class, but there's nothing in here that isn't calculus.
Feel free to suggest changes or additional problems.
Description
Download
Filename
Big O & little o.doc
Filesize
185.5KB
Downloaded
2421 Time(s)
Posted: Sun Mar 27, 2005 9:08 pm
liyi
Navier-Stokes Equations
Offline Joined: 17 Jul 2003 Posts: 1630 Location: Foochow, Fukien
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Does the infinitesimal has an order?
Posted: Sun Mar 27, 2005 9:39 pm
Kent Merryfield
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer
Offline Joined: 11 Jun 2004 Posts: 11425 Location: Long Beach, CA
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
liyi wrote:
Does the infinitesimal has an order?
That's We can see this because that is the order of and is a Lipschitz function.
Remember that big-O doesn't mean "always the same size as", it merely means "no larger than (a constant multiple of)."
Posted: Sun Mar 27, 2005 11:51 pm
liyi
Navier-Stokes Equations
Offline Joined: 17 Jul 2003 Posts: 1630 Location: Foochow, Fukien
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
I meant to find ... It is quite easy for big-Oh
Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2005 1:10 am
Kent Merryfield
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer
Offline Joined: 11 Jun 2004 Posts: 11425 Location: Long Beach, CA
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
liyi, one can see that
We can do this by choosing close to
So you can't do any better than
Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2005 7:24 am
Peter
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer
Offline Joined: 05 May 2004 Posts: 5202 Location: Ghent
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
something must be wrong here, but some stuff I cannot read.
some things get replaced by "Fout!" , which is dutch for "Error!"
do I need to install something specific on word? I've always wondered what those O's were...
_________________ Boo!
Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2005 9:49 am
Kent Merryfield
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer
Offline Joined: 11 Jun 2004 Posts: 11425 Location: Long Beach, CA
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Peter - is the .pdf version any better?
Description
Download
Filename
BigOlittleo.pdf
Filesize
75.02KB
Downloaded
1177 Time(s)
Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2005 9:59 am
adidasty
Poincare Conjecture
Offline Joined: 20 Feb 2005 Posts: 232
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
I downloaded the .pdf and it looks good, but it looks like you did the document in Microsoft Word and didn't use . It turns out fine though.
Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2005 11:53 am
Peter
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer
Offline Joined: 05 May 2004 Posts: 5202 Location: Ghent
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
yes, that works fine, thanks!
_________________ Boo!
Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2005 1:20 pm
liyi
Navier-Stokes Equations
Offline Joined: 17 Jul 2003 Posts: 1630 Location: Foochow, Fukien
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Kent Merryfield wrote:
liyi, one can see that
We can do this by choosing close to
So you can't do any better than
Well, it may be my fault... Perhaps I didn't describe it clearly.
Yours is right. But I just asked small-Oh... In this sense, the order does not exist...
Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2005 4:19 pm
FMako
Riemann Hypothesis
Offline Joined: 21 Oct 2005 Posts: 289 Location: Virginia
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Woah this notation is very neat. It's basically making a function that you don't care about as much, except for it's largest polynomial degree depending on whether you're getting big or small. But what is a lim sup?
Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2005 2:42 pm
Peter
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer
Offline Joined: 05 May 2004 Posts: 5202 Location: Ghent
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
lim sup = limes superior. Some functions do not have a real 'limit', like f(x)=sin(x). So we cal lim sup the highest value it takes in the limit. e.g. for sin(x) that's simply 1.
_________________ Boo!
Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2005 2:45 pm
Kent Merryfield
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer
Offline Joined: 11 Jun 2004 Posts: 11425 Location: Long Beach, CA
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
FMako wrote:
Woah this notation is very neat. It's basically making a function that you don't care about as much, except for it's largest polynomial degree depending on whether you're getting big or small.
And not limited to polynomials: just listen to a bunch of computer scientists discussing whether such-and-such algorithm has complexity that is or or whatever. (Of course, "as " is understood there.)
I invite comparison of two forms of Taylor's theorem: for a sufficiently smooth we can say that
for some between and .
Or we could say that
as
Now the first statement contains more information than the second statement, with its relatively precise estimate of the remainder term. But a very large fraction of the time, you don't really need that additional information, and the second, slightly less precise, statement invites us to perform rapid and effective manipulations involving those terms for which FMako said "you don't care about as much."
Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2005 3:44 pm
FMako
Riemann Hypothesis
Offline Joined: 21 Oct 2005 Posts: 289 Location: Virginia
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
In your exact definitions of the "o" functions, you used a backwards E among other characters, what does the definition mean in english or could you define some of your notation or link me to a site with that notation defined?
Posted: Wed Nov 16, 2005 5:41 pm
Kent Merryfield
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer
Offline Joined: 11 Jun 2004 Posts: 11425 Location: Long Beach, CA
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
It's a logical quantifier. There are two logical quantifiers:
which means "there exists." ( code \exists), and
which means "for all" or "for every." ( code \forall.)
Posted: Wed Nov 16, 2005 7:47 pm
Aunt Sally
Hodge Conjecture
Offline Joined: 27 Feb 2006 Posts: 72
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
That was great. Kent, you're a good explainer. You should write a book.
One thing that has always bugged me is that in numerical analysis, they often say the error is big-O of h, or something like that. But in numerical analysis it seems that we SHOULD care what the constant is! Because if the constant is huge, then in practice our error may be huge. My feeling when I hear numerical analysts say this is, so what, that still doesn't tell me in practice if my error is small or not.
Posted: Wed May 03, 2006 11:34 pm
guile
Yang-Mills Theory
Offline Joined: 05 May 2005 Posts: 535
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Kent Merryfield wrote:
It's a logical quantifier. There are two logical quantifiers:
which means "there exists." ( code \exists), and
which means "for all" or "for every." ( code \forall.)
What do you mean by this the in calculus?
_________________ Cogito Ergo Sum
Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2006 1:06 am
mdk
Navier-Stokes Equations
Offline Joined: 06 Sep 2006 Posts: 1376
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
I believe that that symbol is the delta and in the delta epsilon form (yoiu know,when you're rigorously trying to prove limits.)
Posted: Tue May 22, 2007 5:05 am
quangpbc
Yang-Mills Theory
Offline Joined: 31 May 2007 Posts: 534 Location: Vietnam
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
I think some problems about we ought to post on Box Latex help
Posted: Tue Sep 04, 2007 10:20 pm
bos1234
Riemann Hypothesis
Offline Joined: 24 Jan 2007 Posts: 449
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Thanks prof.
I need to become more familiar with the notations. Other than that its a nice paper.
How come you put iff ? What does iff mean?
Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 4:08 am
Display posts from previous: All Posts 1 Day 7 Days 2 Weeks 1 Month 3 Months 6 Months 1 Year Sort by: Post Time Post Subject Author Ascending Descending