Community

Try our innovative online adaptive learning system, Alcumus.
Over 1100 problems and 60+ video lessons. FREE!
Login Register Memberlist Search AoPS Blogs Contests Galleries Forum Index
The time now is Sat Dec 05, 2009 3:41 am
All times are UTC - 8
View posts since last visit
View unanswered posts
rang inequality 2
Moderators: College Playground Moderators
Post new topic   Reply to topic View previous topicView next topic
5 Posts • Page 1 of 1
Author Message
hxtung
Riemann Hypothesis
Riemann Hypothesis

Offline
Joined: 26 Jul 2003
Posts: 323

To rate posts you must be logged in
#1
rang inequality 2
A Book

Let P,Q,R \in M_n(K). Prove that rang(PQ)+rang(QR) \leq rang(Q)+rang(PQR)
_________________
The heart of Mathematics is its problems

PostPosted: Sat Apr 16, 2005 7:16 pm  Back to top 
  ProfilePM
liyi
Navier-Stokes Equations
Navier-Stokes Equations

Offline
Joined: 17 Jul 2003
Posts: 1630
Location: Foochow, Fukien
China

To rate posts you must be logged in
#2
what is 'rang'?
Range or Rank?

PostPosted: Sat Apr 16, 2005 7:39 pm  Back to top 
  ProfilePMMSN
hxtung
Riemann Hypothesis
Riemann Hypothesis

Offline
Joined: 26 Jul 2003
Posts: 323

To rate posts you must be logged in
#3
rang it means rank
_________________
The heart of Mathematics is its problems

PostPosted: Sat Apr 16, 2005 7:52 pm  Back to top 
  ProfilePM
eugene
Yang-Mills Theory
Yang-Mills Theory

Offline
Joined: 16 May 2004
Posts: 970
Belarus

To rate posts you must be logged in
#4
It is Frobenius inequality:
Firstly let's prove useful inequality,considering our matrices as mapping on vector space over K.Let U \subset V and X:V \to W. Then dim(KerX|_{U})\leq dimKerX=dimV-dimImX (1). If we use inequality (1) for the case U=ImQR,V=ImQ,X=P we obtain that dim(KerP|_{ImQR})\leq dimImQ-dimImPQ (2). On the other hand it is readily that dim(KerP|_{ImQR})=dimImQR-dimImPQR (3). So, applying (2) and (3) we get our inequality

PostPosted: Sat Apr 16, 2005 8:19 pm  Back to top 
  ProfilePMBlog
liyi
Navier-Stokes Equations
Navier-Stokes Equations

Offline
Joined: 17 Jul 2003
Posts: 1630
Location: Foochow, Fukien
China

To rate posts you must be logged in
#5
A different approach.

\begin{pmatrix}
PQ & 0\\
Q & QR
\end{pmatrix}
Multiply the first column by -R to the right and add it to the second column, then multiply the second column by -1,
\begin{pmatrix}
PQ & PQR\\
Q & 0
\end{pmatrix}
Multiply the second row by -A to the left, and add it to the first row
\begin{pmatrix}
0 & PQR\\
Q & 0
\end{pmatrix}

rank(PQ)+rank(QR)=rank
\begin{pmatrix}
PQ & 0\\
0 & QR
\end{pmatrix}
\leq rank
\begin{pmatrix}
PQ & 0\\
Q & Q...

PostPosted: Sat Apr 16, 2005 9:14 pm  Back to top 
  ProfilePMMSN
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
5 Posts • Page 1 of 1
Post new topic   Reply to topic View previous topicView next topic
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum


© Copyright 2008 AoPS Incorporated. All Rights Reserved. • FoundationPrivacyContact Us