Author
Message
lomos_lupin
Yang-Mills Theory
Offline Joined: 15 Mar 2005 Posts: 709 Location: Vancouver
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
convergent sequances just a question
What are the suffice and necessary conditions for a sequance like such that
1. convergent.
2. convergent
2. ,my teacher told me : these 2 conditions are enought but i didnt managed to proof.So would someone confirme the rightness of this?
1. when
2.
_________________ Mind likes to fly to mysterious realms.
Last edited by lomos_lupin on Sun Sep 11, 2005 5:35 am; edited 2 times in total
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 4:06 am
Diarmuid
Poincare Conjecture
Offline Joined: 25 Aug 2004 Posts: 176
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
The answer you have for (1) is wrong - the classical counterexample being , which is decreasing and limits to zero as in the conditions you mention, but the sum of whose terms diverges.
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 5:29 am
lomos_lupin
Yang-Mills Theory
Offline Joined: 15 Mar 2005 Posts: 709 Location: Vancouver
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Diarmuid wrote:
The answer you have for (1) is wrong - the classical counterexample being , which is decreasing and limits to zero as in the conditions you mention, but the sum of whose terms diverges.
I ment this for ,i have edited the post .
By the way ,For what will be
_________________ Mind likes to fly to mysterious realms.
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 5:38 am
Cezar Lupu
Navier-Stokes Equations
Offline Joined: 01 May 2005 Posts: 1825 Location: Bucharest/Constanta, Romania
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
it will be
_________________ In the war, it is NOT the men, but the Man who counts. ( Napoleon Bonaparte)
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 5:47 am
Diarmuid
Poincare Conjecture
Offline Joined: 25 Aug 2004 Posts: 176
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Well it's not really right for the second one either - e.g. gives , which is the same thing.
If you additionally assume that all the terms are positive (or negative), then you'd have a sufficient condition.
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 1:16 am
blahblahblah
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer
Offline Joined: 28 Mar 2004 Posts: 3760
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
1) The only reasonable sufficient condition you're going to get is something like the Cauchy criterion, unless you impose much tighter restrictions on . In particular, is not strong enough.
2) If each is positive, then it is enough to have for , and . This is the alternating series test; you may prove it using partial summation.
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 1:29 am
perfect_radio
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer
Offline Joined: 04 Feb 2005 Posts: 2614 Location: Bucharest
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
i have a related question: knowing that converges, how do you prove that converges?
_________________ "Germany has offered to send troops to the Lebanon border. I bet Israel's breathing a sigh of relief there. Nothing makes Jewish people feel safer and more secure than the German Army marching on their border."
Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2005 10:17 am
Diarmuid
Poincare Conjecture
Offline Joined: 25 Aug 2004 Posts: 176
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Triangle inequality on the partial sums?
(i.e. ).
Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2005 11:32 am
perfect_radio
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer
Offline Joined: 04 Feb 2005 Posts: 2614 Location: Bucharest
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Diarmuid wrote:
Triangle inequality on the partial sums?
(i.e. ).
is this inequality sufficient to prove it? i didn't manage to prove it from here
_________________ "Germany has offered to send troops to the Lebanon border. I bet Israel's breathing a sigh of relief there. Nothing makes Jewish people feel safer and more secure than the German Army marching on their border."
Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2005 1:54 pm
blahblahblah
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer
Offline Joined: 28 Mar 2004 Posts: 3760
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Yes, it is enough. Try using the Cauchy criterion.
Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2005 2:13 pm
Display posts from previous: All Posts 1 Day 7 Days 2 Weeks 1 Month 3 Months 6 Months 1 Year Sort by: Post Time Post Subject Author Ascending Descending