Author
Message
grobber
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer
Offline Joined: 07 Apr 2003 Posts: 7862 Location: Romania
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
f and g
Let f,g:[a,b]->[a,b] be continuous functions s.t. f(g(x))=g(f(x)) for all x in the domain and f is monotonous. Prove that there is a c in [a,b] s.t. f(c)=g(c)=c.
Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2003 8:59 am
Valentin Vornicu
Admin
Offline Joined: 03 Feb 2003 Posts: 7080 Location: California, US
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
nice one. vietnam undergrad 2003.
first of all each of f and g have a fixed point. if f is increasing then let g(d)=d be a fixed point of g. Then f(g(d))=g(f(d)) => f(d) = g(f(d)) which means that also f(d) is a fixed point. In this way we create a sequence (f(n) (d) )n which is a bounded sequence, and also monotonous (since f is increasing), thus convergent. it's limit is the point c we are looking for.
the case when f is decreasing is even easier: consider a random fixed point of f, f(c)=c. Then g(c)=f(g(c)) then g(c) is also a fixed point, and if g(c)<c then g(c) = f(g(c)) > f(c) =c which is a contradiction! again a contradiction arises when we try g(c)>c. Thus only one option remains valid: g(c)=c=f(c) and we are done.
hope all of you know why a continuous function f:[a,b]->[a,b] has a fixed point
_________________ We all use math everyday: to forecast weather, to tell time, to handle money; we also use math to analyze crime, reveal patterns, predict behavior. Using numbers we can solve the biggest mysteries we know.
Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2003 10:02 am
christi
New Member
Offline Joined: 29 Dec 2003 Posts: 9 Location: Targoviste
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
How??
Posted: Sat Jan 03, 2004 2:46 pm
Valentin Vornicu
Admin
Offline Joined: 03 Feb 2003 Posts: 7080 Location: California, US
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
well consider the auxiliar function g(x)=f(x)-x. Obviously it's continous, and g(a)=f(a)-a \geq 0 and g(b)=f(b)-b \leq 0 thus it must also take the intermediate value 0 ...
maybe your "how" was directed to another thing?
_________________ We all use math everyday: to forecast weather, to tell time, to handle money; we also use math to analyze crime, reveal patterns, predict behavior. Using numbers we can solve the biggest mysteries we know.
Posted: Sat Jan 03, 2004 2:51 pm
amfulger
Yang-Mills Theory
Offline Joined: 03 May 2003 Posts: 993 Location: Ann Arbor or Constanta
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Valentin Vornicu wrote:
the case when f is decreasing is even easier: consider a random fixed point of f, f(c)=c. .....and if g(c)<c then g(c) = f(g(c)) > f(c) =c which is a contradiction! again a contradiction arises when we try g(c)>c. Thus only one option remains valid: g(c)=c=f(c) and we are done.
I think the > in your proof should be replaced by \geq. I don't see why should f be injective. This doesn't change anything. The proof is still valid, but a nicer contradiction is obtained.
Posted: Sun Jan 04, 2004 7:41 pm
Valentin Vornicu
Admin
Offline Joined: 03 Feb 2003 Posts: 7080 Location: California, US
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
f is decreasing ( that is f(x)<f(y) when x>y) and g(c) I supposed it is smaller than c which means that f(g(c))>f(c). nu equality involved.
_________________ We all use math everyday: to forecast weather, to tell time, to handle money; we also use math to analyze crime, reveal patterns, predict behavior. Using numbers we can solve the biggest mysteries we know.
Posted: Sun Jan 04, 2004 10:47 pm
amfulger
Yang-Mills Theory
Offline Joined: 03 May 2003 Posts: 993 Location: Ann Arbor or Constanta
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
So what you mean is that you only consider the situations f is increasing (x>y => f(x)>f(y))and f is decreasing (x>y =>f(x)<f(y)).
Then I suppose that you consider that the monotonous functions are injective. In Romania we use strictly monotonous for this. So what does the monotonous in the problem text stand for?
Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2004 8:00 am
Valentin Vornicu
Admin
Offline Joined: 03 Feb 2003 Posts: 7080 Location: California, US
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
in Romanian you use the word "monoton". In English monotonous means either increasing or decreasing, that is (f(x)-f(y))(x-y) > 0 or (f(x)-f(y))(x-y) <0 for any x,y. I belive that you have an English problem here
_________________ We all use math everyday: to forecast weather, to tell time, to handle money; we also use math to analyze crime, reveal patterns, predict behavior. Using numbers we can solve the biggest mysteries we know.
Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2004 8:12 am
grobber
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer
Offline Joined: 07 Apr 2003 Posts: 7862 Location: Romania
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
I don't think monotonous means strict inequalities. I also think that we should use "strictly monotonous" if we're referring to monotonous and injective functions.
Posted: Tue Jan 06, 2004 5:00 am
Valiowk
Riemann Hypothesis
Offline Joined: 07 Sep 2003 Posts: 375 Location: Singapore
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Well, if you see this link and that link , you'll understand where the confusion comes from.
Personally, I can't even remember what I learnt monotone to be during training sessions... (this is what query forms are for...)
Posted: Tue Jan 06, 2004 5:07 am
liyi
Navier-Stokes Equations
Offline Joined: 17 Jul 2003 Posts: 1630 Location: Foochow, Fukien
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
In high school books, 'increasing' and 'decreasing' mean strict inequalities.
But in the most math analysis books, it allows equality. So we should use 'strictly increasing(decreasing)'
Posted: Tue Jan 06, 2004 5:18 am
Display posts from previous: All Posts 1 Day 7 Days 2 Weeks 1 Month 3 Months 6 Months 1 Year Sort by: Post Time Post Subject Author Ascending Descending