Community

Want to learn how to tackle those tough AMC/AIME/Olympiad algebra problems? Check out Art of Problem Solving's Intermediate Algebra by Richard Rusczyk and Mathew Crawford. Over 1600 problems!
Login Register Memberlist Search AoPS Blogs Contests Galleries Forum Index
The time now is Tue Nov 24, 2009 5:43 pm
All times are UTC - 8
View posts since last visit
View unanswered posts
Geometric Probability
Moderators: Pre-Olympiad Moderators
Post new topic   Reply to topic View previous topicView next topic
17 Posts • Page 1 of 1
Author Message
ComplexZeta
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer


Offline
Joined: 27 May 2003
Posts: 2862
Location: Sunnyvale, CA, USA
United States

To rate posts you must be logged in
#1
Geometric Probability

What is the probability that 11 points on a sphere lie in the same hemisphere? What about n points? (If you have solved it for 11, I can't imagine that you haven't solved it for n.) If you have seen it before, please don't give it away.
_________________
\mathbb{C}\zeta
Simon Rubinstein-Salzedo

PostPosted: Fri Feb 06, 2004 5:53 pm  Back to top 
  ProfilePM
JBL
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer

Offline
Joined: 04 Jul 2003
Posts: 10758
Location: Brooklyn, NY or Cambridge, MA
United States

To rate posts you must be logged in
#2
This is really cool. I think I'm going to start off working on a circle, though -- do you think that will give me any insight?
_________________
Joel
Hi Deeps! <3

PostPosted: Sun Feb 08, 2004 12:22 pm  Back to top 
  ProfilePMWWW
zscool
Riemann Hypothesis
Riemann Hypothesis


Offline
Joined: 22 Jun 2003
Posts: 482

To rate posts you must be logged in
#3
I dont think it makes it any easier to consider it on a circle first.

Click to reveal hidden content
Try to think about the necessary conditions for the 11 points to be on a hemisphere.


PostPosted: Sun Feb 08, 2004 12:43 pm  Back to top 
  ProfilePM
ComplexZeta
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer


Offline
Joined: 27 May 2003
Posts: 2862
Location: Sunnyvale, CA, USA
United States

To rate posts you must be logged in
#4
I think I agree with zscool. Maybe keep in mind that a sphere is (effectively) a disjoint union of two discs, two line segments, and two points. (Wow, I've been doing too much topology.) I don't know how much that helps though. By the way, this problem is really hard.
_________________
\mathbb{C}\zeta
Simon Rubinstein-Salzedo

PostPosted: Sun Feb 08, 2004 12:58 pm  Back to top 
  ProfilePM
churchilljrhigh
Yang-Mills Theory
Yang-Mills Theory


Offline
Joined: 23 Oct 2003
Posts: 582
Location: AZN Paradise
United States

To rate posts you must be logged in
#5
is it on the sphere's surface or inside the sphere?
_________________
The AZN Sensation
Alive & Kicking!

PostPosted: Sun Feb 08, 2004 6:54 pm  Back to top 
  ProfilePMWWW
Alison
Riemann Hypothesis
Riemann Hypothesis


Offline
Joined: 26 May 2003
Posts: 255
Location: Upstate NY / Cambridge, MA

To rate posts you must be logged in
#6
I don't know if this goes anywhere, but...
Click to reveal hidden content

I'm thinking convex hulls might work, because 11 points lying in an (open) hemisphere is the same thing as saying that the center of the sphere does not lie in their convex hull. For which matter, this is the same as saying that for any 4 points of the 11, the center of the sphere does not lie in the convex hull of those 4. However, this still looks messy.


PostPosted: Sun Feb 08, 2004 7:19 pm  Back to top 
  ProfilePM
ComplexZeta
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer


Offline
Joined: 27 May 2003
Posts: 2862
Location: Sunnyvale, CA, USA
United States

To rate posts you must be logged in
#7
It means on the sphere's surface. I don't think it matters though.

Interesting approach Alison. I'm also not sure if it will work, but give it a try.
_________________
\mathbb{C}\zeta
Simon Rubinstein-Salzedo

PostPosted: Sun Feb 08, 2004 9:31 pm  Back to top 
  ProfilePM
Alison
Riemann Hypothesis
Riemann Hypothesis


Offline
Joined: 26 May 2003
Posts: 255
Location: Upstate NY / Cambridge, MA

To rate posts you must be logged in
#8
I am, and I'm getting a messy inclusion-exclusion argument -- and that's just for five points, so I probably need to be more clever. Hm. At least I have a nice argument that the probability for 4 points is 7/8:Click to reveal hidden content
by picking one point and dividing into cases according to whether that point is inside the spherical triangle (the one with no angles > 180) formed by the other three points).
Hm. Perhaps I'll join JBL and look at circles to give my brain a rest. I'm also wondering how this generalizes to higher dimensions. I have a conjecture that the probability that the probablility that n+1 points on the surface of an n-dimensional sphere lie on a hemisphere is 1-1/(2^n), but the proof I have doesn't obviously extend.

ComplexZeta wrote:

Interesting approach Alison. I'm also not sure if it will work, but give it a try.


PostPosted: Mon Feb 09, 2004 12:04 pm  Back to top 
  ProfilePM
ComplexZeta
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer


Offline
Joined: 27 May 2003
Posts: 2862
Location: Sunnyvale, CA, USA
United States

To rate posts you must be logged in
#9
7/8 is definitely correct for 4. I'll check if your conjecture is right for higher dimensions (or at least for S3, since I know how to do that fairly easily).
_________________
\mathbb{C}\zeta
Simon Rubinstein-Salzedo

PostPosted: Mon Feb 09, 2004 3:41 pm  Back to top 
  ProfilePM
gauss202
Navier-Stokes Equations
Navier-Stokes Equations

Offline
Joined: 05 Jun 2003
Posts: 2061
Location: Columbia, SC
United States

To rate posts you must be logged in
#10
Has anyone found a solution to this problem?

PostPosted: Thu Feb 24, 2005 9:13 pm  Back to top 
  ProfilePMYM
joml88
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer


Offline
Joined: 29 Feb 2004
Posts: 6133
Location: Brookline, MA
United States

To rate posts you must be logged in
#11
This problem came from the 1999 BAMM-a 50 minute 20 question multiple choice test!!! Guess who wrote those questions. None other than Paul Zeitz!

Honestly, I haven't looked at the solution yet and I don't know how to do the problem. I'm pretty much saving it for when I think I might be able to solve it...

lol, Mr. Rusczyk told me a while ago that Zeitz probably made this problem so that Gabriel Carroll wouldn't get a perfect score...it worked Mr. Green

O, yeah...Here's the website. It's the last question of the 1999 Test of Ingenuity.

PostPosted: Fri Feb 25, 2005 3:43 am  Back to top 
  ProfilePMBlogAlbum
probability1.01
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer


Offline
Joined: 06 Apr 2004
Posts: 2915
Location: J'ai oublié
ChinaUnited States

To rate posts you must be logged in
#12
Perhaps you can identify a hemisphere by the point in the hemisphere that is equidistant to all points on its boundary (so kinda like the north pole for the northern hemisphere on earth). Then notice that every point excludes a hemisphere of hemisphere points... if that makes any sense. 11 points share a hemisphere only if they do not collectively exclude the whole sphere. Anyway, I still have no clue about the solution Smile.
_________________
Don't hatch your chickens before they count. Otherwise, they will be far behind in middle school math and perform poorly at MathCounts.

the Search for a Blog Name Continues. . .

PostPosted: Sat Feb 26, 2005 11:59 am  Back to top 
  ProfilePMAIMYMBlog
goodyfresh741
Hodge Conjecture
Hodge Conjecture


Offline
Joined: 02 Oct 2004
Posts: 55
Location: Maryland
United States

To rate posts you must be logged in
#13
A necessary and sufficient condition? Integration?

probability1.01 wrote:
Perhaps you can identify a hemisphere by the point in the hemisphere that is equidistant to all points on its boundary (so kinda like the north pole for the northern hemisphere on earth). Then notice that every point excludes a hemisphere of hemisphere points... if that makes any sense. 11 points share a hemisphere only if they do not collectively exclude the whole sphere. Anyway, I still have no clue about the solution Smile.


Are you trying to say that a necessary and sufficient condition that some set of points A lies in a hemisphere is that one can find some point P on the sphere's surface such that all points in A are a distance of less than or equal to :pi:*r/2 from the point P, where r is the radius of the sphere and distance is taken along the great circles of the sphere? Because that IS a necessary and sufficient condition, now that I think about it.

With that in mind, look at points A and B on the sphere's surface which are a distance x from eachother, the probability that a point lies in the hemisphere centered at A OR the hemisphere at B is then easily seen to be 1-x/(2:pi:*r) by looking at the necessary areas. That seems like it could be a start, but I don't know where to go from there.
_________________
There is an infinite set A that is not too big-- John Von Neumann

PostPosted: Sun Feb 27, 2005 5:00 pm  Back to top 
  ProfilePMAIM
Singular
Yang-Mills Theory
Yang-Mills Theory

Offline
Joined: 26 May 2004
Posts: 749
Canada

To rate posts you must be logged in
#14
this was also on putnam very recent.
_________________
Alex Wice

PostPosted: Sun Feb 27, 2005 9:47 pm  Back to top 
  ProfilePM
blahblahblah
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer

Offline
Joined: 28 Mar 2004
Posts: 3757
Canada

To rate posts you must be logged in
#15
Singular wrote:
this was also on putnam very recent.


Not really. The Putnam problem (A2 2003?) was much easier, all you needed to do was draw one great circle and apply the pigeonhole principle. I don't have any clue as to how you account for the other 6 points in this problem.

PostPosted: Sun Feb 27, 2005 10:17 pm  Back to top 
  ProfilePM
Myth
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer


Offline
Joined: 02 Sep 2003
Posts: 4485
Location: Chelyabinsk, Russia
Russian Federation

To rate posts you must be logged in
#16
See http://www.artofproblemsolving.com/Forum/viewtopic.php?t=5715
_________________
Myth is out of here

PostPosted: Thu Apr 21, 2005 10:58 am  Back to top 
  ProfilePM
seamusoboyle
Navier-Stokes Equations
Navier-Stokes Equations


Offline
Joined: 16 Jan 2005
Posts: 1104
Location: Ireland baby!
Ireland

To rate posts you must be logged in
#17
How about saying that all the point have to be within r unit (radius) of a certain plan tangent to the sphere? Or join all the points to the centre and look at the angles between the lines....
_________________
Newton is dead, Einstein is dead, and im not feeling too good myself...

PostPosted: Thu Apr 21, 2005 11:57 am  Back to top 
  ProfilePMWWW
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
17 Posts • Page 1 of 1
Post new topic   Reply to topic View previous topicView next topic
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum


© Copyright 2008 AoPS Incorporated. All Rights Reserved. • FoundationPrivacyContact Us