EDIT: An edited and extended (Theorem 1 generalized even further, Theorem 5 extended and proved anew) version of the below solution can be found here:
http://projectpen.files.wordpress.com/2 ... en-e16.pdf
or here:
http://www.cip.ifi.lmu.de/~grinberg/pene16.pdf
Peter wrote:
Prove that for any prime

in the interval
![\left]n, \frac {4n}{3}\right]](http://data.artofproblemsolving.com/images/latex/5/e/9/5e9c2e73b7e63e75a194d89cd1cc0ecfc0904914.gif)
,

divides

Nice and instructive problem. Let's generalize:
Theorem 1. If
and
are positive integers and
is a prime such that
, then
.
Before we prove this, we first show some basic facts about binomial coefficients and remainders modulo primes.
Definition. The binomial coefficient

is defined for all reals

and for all integers

as follows:

if

is a positive integer,

, and

if

is a negative integer.
Theorem 2, the upper negation identity. If
is a real, and
is an integer, then
.
Proof of Theorem 2. We will only consider the case of

being positive (the other cases are trivial). Then, using the definition of binomial coefficients,

.
This proves Theorem 2.
Theorem 3. If
is a prime, if
and
are two integers such that
, and if
is an integer such that
, then
.
Proof of Theorem 3. If

, then

, so that Theorem 3 is trivial. Thus, it remains to consider the case

only. In this case,

is coprime with

(since

, and all numbers

,

, ...,

are coprime with

, since

is a prime and

).
Now,

yields

.
Since

is coprime with

, we can divide this congruence by

, and thus we get

. Hence, Theorem 3 is proven.
Finally, a basic property of binomial coefficients:
Theorem 4. For every nonnegative integer
and any integer
, we have
.
This is known, but it is important not to forget the condition that

is nonnegative (it is necessary!).
Now to something completely different:
Theorem 5. If
is a prime, and
is a polynomial of degree
whose coefficients are all integers, then
.
Proof of Theorem 5. Since

is a polynomial of degree

whose coefficients are all integers, it can be written in the form

with

being an integer (not necessarily nonzero) for every

.
Hence,

.
But for every

, we have

(in fact, for

, this is clear since

, and for

, this is equivalent to

(since

, because

), what follows from
http://www.problem-solving.be/pen/viewtopic.php?t=676 part
a) because

). Thus,

,
and Theorem 5 is proven.
Proof of Theorem 1. We have

, since

yields

.
Also,

yields

, so that

, thus

, or, equivalently,

.
We have to prove that

. This rewrites as

. This is equivalent to

(in fact, since

, the two sums

and

differ only in some terms

with indices

in the interval
![\left]n;\;p - 1\right]](http://data.artofproblemsolving.com/images/latex/6/2/7/6279c6ea46e363199214db9aab7b8750bac151b6.gif)
, and these terms are zero, so we have

).
For every integer

with

, we have

(after Theorem 2)

(by Theorem 3, since

and

)

(by Theorem 4, since

is nonnegative, since

and

)

,
so that

(since

is even).
Therefore,
(1)

.
Now,
is a polynomial of the variable

whose degree is

. Thus,
is a polynomial of the variable

whose degree is

. Since

, it is therefore a polynomial of degree

. Since the coefficients of this polynomial are all integers, Theorem 5 thus yields

.
Using
(1), this becomes

.
Now,

is coprime with

(since

, and all numbers

,

, ...,

are coprime with

because

is a prime and

). Hence, we can divide this congruence by

, and obtain

. As we said, this proves Theorem 1.
Darij