|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 7 posts ] |
|
Share:
|
| Author |
Message |
hien
Posts: 623 Location: ASEAN
|
Posted: May 05, 2007, 1:14 am •
# 1
Let  be three angles of triangle  . Prove that:

|
|
|
hipsishopsis
Posts: 43
|
Posted: May 05, 2007, 6:18 am •
# 2
Hidden TextFirst note that if one of the angles is  radians then the left side is  and right side is  . So let's assume they are all in the range  .  On the given range this is equivalent to:  . Now note that as  when  every term on the left side is  .
|
|
|
scorpius119
Posts: 1678 Location: ..., PA
|
Posted: May 05, 2007, 11:44 am •
# 3
hipsishopsis wrote: Hidden TextFirst note that if one of the angles is  radians then the left side is  and right side is  . So let's assume they are all in the range  .  On the given range this is equivalent to:  . Now note that as  when  every term on the left side is  . That last part doesn't work; it only guarantees each term nonnegative. Hidden TextIt is true that we can reduce this to acute triangles, because if right/obtuse,  Otherwise, let  . Observe that one of  must be nonnegative (since they are three numbers with nonnegative product). WLOG let  . Now the inequality is equivalent to  From  , we have  , which becomes  . We can now multiply by the positive  . It remains to prove  Guess what? It turns out that their difference is  (that's what motivated the WLOG in the first place), so we're done.
|
|
|
hipsishopsis
Posts: 43
|
Posted: May 05, 2007, 12:03 pm •
# 4
scorpius119 wrote: hipsishopsis wrote: Hidden TextFirst note that if one of the angles is  radians then the left side is  and right side is  . So let's assume they are all in the range  .  On the given range this is equivalent to:  . Now note that as  when  every term on the left side is  . That last part doesn't work; it only guarantees each term nonnegative.
Oops, you're right - careless thinking here 
|
|
|
arqady
Posts: 5983 Location: shevah school, tel-aviv
|
Posted: May 05, 2007, 12:46 pm •
# 5
hien wrote: Let  be three angles of triangle  . Prove that: 
Let  is acute angle triangle and use the following inequality:
 and similar.
_________________ Michael Rozenberg
|
|
|
Teki-Teki
Posts: 553 Location: Within 12600 km of you.
|
Posted: May 06, 2007, 4:30 am •
# 6
hmm... if  does that imply  for  ?
if so then the inequality follows from  which can be shown by Jensen's.
EDIT: never mind, the first assumption does not hold - consider 
_________________ Mathematics, rightly viewed, possesses not only truth, but supreme beauty - a beauty cold and austere, like that of sculpture. - Bertrand Russell
|
|
|
April
Posts: 1271 Location: Hanoi, Vietnam
|
Posted: May 06, 2007, 5:39 am •
# 7
 If triangle  is obtuse then the proposed inequality is true.
 If triangle  is acute, then we have:
which is trivial.
|
|
|
Share:
Moderators: orl, N.T.TUAN, darij grinberg, MithsApprentice, Peter, pbornsztein, Megus, harazi, Arne, blahblahblah, pvthuan, Cezar Lupu, High School Olympiad Moderators
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 7 posts ] |
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
|