LOGIN/REGISTER
Please Wait...
It is currently Sep 09, 2010, 2:08 am
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ]  Share: Facebook
Message
Post Posted: May 24, 2007, 5:24 pm • # 1 


Let k,m, and n be natural numbers such that m+k+1 is a prime greater than n+1. Let c_{s}=s(s+1). Prove that the product (c_{m+1}-c_{k})(c_{m+2}-c_{k})\cdots (c_{m+n}-c_{k}) is divisible by the product c_{1}c_{2}\cdots c_{n}.
 
 
Post Posted: Jul 21, 2007, 7:24 pm • # 2 


nicetry007 wrote:
The product

(c_{m+1}-c_{k})\; (c_{m+2}-c_{k})\;\cdots\; (c_{m+n}-c_{k})\;

= \left((m+1)(m+2)-k(k+1)\right)\;\left((m+2)(m+3)-k(k+1)\right)\;\cdots \left((m+n)(m+n+1)-k(k+1)\right)

= (m+1-k)(m+k+2)\; (m+2-k)(m+k+3)\;\cdots\;(m+n-k)(m+k+n+1)

= \Pi_{i =1}^{n}(m+i-k) \;\Pi_{i=1}^{n}(m+k+i+1)

The product

c_{1}\;c_{2}\; \cdots \; c_{n}= (1 \cdot 2)\; (2 \cdot 3)\; \cdots \; (n \cdot (n+1))\; = n! (n+1)!

The ratio
\frac{(c_{m+1}-c_{k})\; (c_{m+2}-c_{k})\;\cdots\; (c_{m+n}-c_{k})\;}{c_{1}\;c_{2}\; \cdots \; c_{n}}

= \frac{\Pi_{i =1}^{n}(m+i-k) \;\Pi_{i=1}^{n}(m+k+i+1)}{n! (n+1)!}

= \;^{(m+n-k)}C_{n}\;\cdot \; \left( \frac{1}{m+k+1}\right) \;\cdot \;^{(m+k+n+1)}C_{ n+1}

Since n+1\; < \;m+k+1, the binomial term ^{(m+k+n+1)}C_{ n+1} is divisible by (m+k+1). Hence,

\left( \frac{1}{m+k+1}\right) \;^{(m+k+n+1)}C_{ n+1} is an integer and the product (c_{m+1}-c_{k})\; (c_{m+2}-c_{k})\;\cdots\; (c_{m+n}-c_{k})\; is divisible by c_{1}\;c_{2}\; \cdots \; c_{n}.

_________________
Boo!
 
 
Post Posted: Dec 03, 2008, 2:05 pm • # 3 


Could you explain me how you reduced
\frac{\Pi_{i =1}^{n}(m+i-k) \;\Pi_{i=1}^{n}(m+k+i+1)}{n! (n+1)!}
to:
\;^{(m+n-k)}C_{n}\;\cdot \; \left( \frac{1}{m+k+1}\right) \;\cdot \;^{(m+k+n+1)}C_{ n+1}
Thank you.
 
 
Post Posted: Dec 03, 2008, 5:18 pm • # 4 


Yeah, that reduction is wrong indeed.

I also think an extra condition m>k or m+n<k wouldould be necessary, otherwise we have to show 0|c_1\cdots c_n, which is obviously false.

_________________
Boo!
 
 
Post Posted: Jan 06, 2009, 12:01 pm • # 5 


Write m + k + 1 =: p (a prime) > n + 1. Note that
c_{1}c_{2} \cdots  c_{n} = (1 \cdot 2) (2 \cdot 3) \cdots  (n \cdot (n + 1)) = n! (n + 1)! = (n + 1)(n!)^2

whilst
\begin{array}{cl}
         & (c_{m + 1} - c_{k}) (c_{m + 2} - c_{k})\cdots (c_{m + n} - c_{k})\\
  \mbox{ =} & \left(...

Now I am going to show that (n+1) \left| {{p+n} \choose p} \right. i.e. \frac{1}{n+1} {{p+n} \choose p} \in \mathbb{Z} and we are done.
\frac{1}{n+1} {{p+n} \choose p} = \frac{(p+n)!}{(n+1)!p!} = \frac{1}{p}\frac{(p+n)!}{(n+1)!(p-1)!} = \frac{1}{p}{{p+n}\choose...
Note that p | (p+n)! (since p<p+n), but p \not| (n+1)! (since n+1<p) and p \not| (p-1)! (since p-1<p).
So the prime p \left|\frac{(p+n)!}{(n+1)!(p-1)!} \right. \blacklozenge
 
 
Post Posted: Jul 25, 2009, 4:25 am • # 6 


Phill and Peter,

The reduction is not wrong. If m+1 \leq k \leq m+n, then the result is trivially true as c_1c_2...c_n|0. If k < m+1, then follow the proof from the second post.
 
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]

Share: Facebook
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

Login

Username:   Password:   Log me on automatically each visit  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum