LOGIN/REGISTER
Please Wait...
It is currently Sep 02, 2010, 11:17 am
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ]  Share: Facebook
Message
Post Posted: May 24, 2007, 5:24 pm • # 1 


Prove that for any prime p in the interval \left]n, \frac{4n}{3}\right], p divides \sum^{n}_{j=0}{{n}\choose{j}}^{4}.
 
 
Post Posted: May 24, 2007, 5:24 pm • # 2 


EDIT: An edited and extended (Theorem 1 generalized even further, Theorem 5 extended and proved anew) version of the below solution can be found here:
http://projectpen.files.wordpress.com/2 ... en-e16.pdf
or here:
http://www.cip.ifi.lmu.de/~grinberg/pene16.pdf

Peter wrote:
Prove that for any prime p in the interval \left]n, \frac {4n}{3}\right], p divides
\sum^{n}_{j = 0}{{n}\choose{j}}^{4}.


Nice and instructive problem. Let's generalize:

Theorem 1. If n and k are positive integers and p is a prime such that \frac {2k - 1}{2k}\left(p - 1\right) < n < p, then p\mid\sum_{j = 0}^{n}\binom{n}{j}^{2k}.

Before we prove this, we first show some basic facts about binomial coefficients and remainders modulo primes.

Definition. The binomial coefficient \binom{x}{u} is defined for all reals x and for all integers u as follows: \binom{x}{u} = \frac {x\cdot\left(x - 1\right)\cdot ...\cdot\left(x - u + 1\right)}{u!} if u is a positive integer, \binom{x}{0} = 1, and \binom{x}{u} = 0 if u is a negative integer.

Theorem 2, the upper negation identity. If n is a real, and r is an integer, then \binom{ - n}{r} = \left( - 1\right)^{r}\binom{n + r - 1}{r}.

Proof of Theorem 2. We will only consider the case of r being positive (the other cases are trivial). Then, using the definition of binomial coefficients,

\binom{ - n}{r} = \frac {\left( - n\right)\cdot\left( - n - 1\right)\cdot ...\cdot\left( - n - r + 1\right)}{r!} = \left( - 1...
= \left( - 1\right)^{r}\cdot\frac {\left(n + r - 1\right)\cdot ...\cdot\left(n + 1\right)\cdot n}{r!} = \left( - 1\right)^{r}....

This proves Theorem 2.

Theorem 3. If p is a prime, if u and v are two integers such that u\equiv v\mod p, and if k is an integer such that k < p, then \binom{u}{k}\equiv\binom{v}{k}\mod p.

Proof of Theorem 3. If k\leq 0, then \binom{u}{k} = \binom{v}{k}, so that Theorem 3 is trivial. Thus, it remains to consider the case k > 0 only. In this case, k! is coprime with p (since k! = 1\cdot 2\cdot ...\cdot k, and all numbers 1, 2, ..., k are coprime with p, since p is a prime and k < p).

Now, u\equiv v\mod p yields

k!\cdot\binom{u}{k} = k!\cdot\frac {u\cdot\left(u - 1\right)\cdot ...\cdot\left(u - k + 1\right)}{k!} = u\cdot\left(u - 1\rig...
\equiv v\cdot\left(v - 1\right)\cdot ...\cdot\left(v - k + 1\right) = k!\cdot\frac {v\cdot\left(v - 1\right)\cdot ...\cdot\le...
= k!\cdot\binom{v}{k}\mod p.

Since k! is coprime with p, we can divide this congruence by k!, and thus we get \binom{u}{k}\equiv\binom{v}{k}\mod p. Hence, Theorem 3 is proven.

Finally, a basic property of binomial coefficients:

Theorem 4. For every nonnegative integer n and any integer k, we have \binom{n}{k} = \binom{n}{n - k}.

This is known, but it is important not to forget the condition that n is nonnegative (it is necessary!).

Now to something completely different:

Theorem 5. If p is a prime, and f is a polynomial of degree < p - 1 whose coefficients are all integers, then \sum_{j = 0}^{p - 1}f\left(j\right)\equiv 0\mod p.

Proof of Theorem 5. Since f is a polynomial of degree < p - 1 whose coefficients are all integers, it can be written in the form f\left(X\right) = \sum_{i = 0}^{p - 2}f_{i}X^{i} with f_{i} being an integer (not necessarily nonzero) for every i\in\left\{0;\;1;\;...;\;p - 3;\;p - 2\right\}.

Hence,

\sum_{j = 0}^{p - 1}f\left(j\right) = \sum_{j = 0}^{p - 1}\sum_{i = 0}^{p - 2}f_{i}j^{i} = \sum_{i = 0}^{p - 2}f_{i}\cdot\sum....

But for every i\in\left\{0;\;1;\;...;\;p - 3;\;p - 2\right\}, we have \sum_{j = 0}^{p - 1}j^{i}\equiv 0\mod p (in fact, for i = 0, this is clear since \sum_{j = 0}^{p - 1}j^{0} = \sum_{j = 0}^{p - 1}1 = p, and for i\geq 1, this is equivalent to \sum_{j = 1}^{p}j^{i}\equiv 0\mod p (since \sum_{j = 0}^{p - 1}j^{i}\equiv \sum_{j = 1}^{p}j^{i}\mod p, because 0^{i}\equiv p^{i}\mod p), what follows from http://www.problem-solving.be/pen/viewtopic.php?t=676 part a) because p - 1\nmid i). Thus,

\sum_{j = 0}^{p - 1}f\left(j\right) = \sum_{i = 0}^{p - 2}f_{i}\cdot\sum_{j = 0}^{p - 1}j^{i}\equiv\sum_{i = 0}^{p - 2}f_{i}\...,

and Theorem 5 is proven.

Proof of Theorem 1. We have p - n - 1\geq 0, since n < p yields n + 1\leq p.

Also, \frac {2k - 1}{2k}\left(p - 1\right) < n yields \left(2k - 1\right)\left(p - 1\right) < 2kn, so that 2k\left(p - 1\right) - \left(p - 1\right) < 2kn, thus 2k\left(p - 1\right) - 2kn < p - 1, or, equivalently, 2k\left(p - n - 1\right) < p - 1.

We have to prove that p\mid\sum_{j = 0}^{n}\binom{n}{j}^{2k}. This rewrites as \sum_{j = 0}^{n}\binom{n}{j}^{2k}\equiv 0\mod p. This is equivalent to \sum_{j = 0}^{p - 1}\binom{n}{j}^{2k}\equiv 0\mod p (in fact, since n < p, the two sums \sum_{j = 0}^{p - 1}\binom{n}{j}^{2k} and \sum_{j = 0}^{n}\binom{n}{j}^{2k} differ only in some terms \binom{n}{j}^{2k} with indices j in the interval \left]n;\;p - 1\right], and these terms are zero, so we have \sum_{j = 0}^{p - 1}\binom{n}{j}^{2k} = \sum_{j = 0}^{n}\binom{n}{j}^{2k}).

For every integer j with 0\leq j < p, we have

\binom{n}{j} = \binom{ - \left( - n\right)}{j} = \left( - 1\right)^{j}\binom{\left( - n\right) + j - 1}{j} (after Theorem 2)
\equiv\left( - 1\right)^{j}\binom{p - n + j - 1}{j} (by Theorem 3, since \left( - n\right) + j - 1\equiv p - n + j - 1\mod p and j < p)
= \left( - 1\right)^{j}\binom{p - n + j - 1}{\left(p - n + j - 1\right) - j} (by Theorem 4, since p - n + j - 1 is nonnegative, since p - n - 1\geq 0 and j\geq 0)
= \left( - 1\right)^{j}\binom{p - n + j - 1}{p - n - 1}\mod p,

so that

\binom{n}{j}^{2k}\equiv\left(\left( - 1\right)^{j}\binom{p - n + j - 1}{p - n - 1}\right)^{2k} = \binom{p - n + j - 1}{p - n ... (since 2k is even).

Therefore,

(1) \left(p - n - 1\right)!^{2k}\cdot\sum_{j = 0}^{p - 1}\binom{n}{j}^{2k}\equiv\left(p - n - 1\right)!^{2k}\cdot\sum_{j = 0}^{p ...
= \sum_{j = 0}^{p - 1}\left(\left(p - n - 1\right)!\cdot\binom{p - n + j - 1}{p - n - 1}\right)^{2k}
= \sum_{j = 0}^{p - 1}\left(\left(p - n - 1\right)!\cdot\frac {\prod_{u = 0}^{\left(p - n - 1\right) - 1}\left(\left(p - n + ...
= \sum_{j = 0}^{p - 1}\left(\prod_{u = 0}^{\left(p - n - 1\right) - 1}\left(\left(p - n + j - 1\right) - u\right)\right)^{2k}....

Now,

\prod_{u = 0}^{\left(p - n - 1\right) - 1}\left(\left(p - n + X - 1\right) - u\right)

is a polynomial of the variable X whose degree is p - n - 1. Thus,

\left(\prod_{u = 0}^{\left(p - n - 1\right) - 1}\left(\left(p - n + X - 1\right) - u\right)\right)^{2k}

is a polynomial of the variable X whose degree is 2k\left(p - n - 1\right). Since 2k\left(p - n - 1\right) < p - 1, it is therefore a polynomial of degree < p - 1. Since the coefficients of this polynomial are all integers, Theorem 5 thus yields

\sum_{j = 0}^{p - 1}\left(\prod_{u = 0}^{\left(p - n - 1\right) - 1}\left(\left(p - n + j - 1\right) - u\right)\right)^{2k}\e....

Using (1), this becomes

\left(p - n - 1\right)!^{2k}\cdot\sum_{j = 0}^{p - 1}\binom{n}{j}^{2k}\equiv 0\mod p.

Now, \left(p - n - 1\right)! is coprime with p (since \left(p - n - 1\right)! = 1\cdot 2\cdot ...\cdot\left(p - n - 1\right), and all numbers 1, 2, ..., p - n - 1 are coprime with p because p is a prime and p - n - 1 < p). Hence, we can divide this congruence by \left(p - n - 1\right)!^{2k}, and obtain \sum_{j = 0}^{p - 1}\binom{n}{j}^{2k}\equiv 0\mod p. As we said, this proves Theorem 1.

Darij
 
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]

Share: Facebook
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 

Login

Username:   Password:   Log me on automatically each visit  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum