Community

Try our innovative online adaptive learning system, Alcumus.
Over 1100 problems and 60+ video lessons. FREE!
Login Register Memberlist Search AoPS Blogs Contests Galleries Forum Index
The time now is Sun Nov 22, 2009 9:00 pm
All times are UTC - 8
View posts since last visit
View unanswered posts
positive definite matrices + kronecker product
Moderators: College Playground Moderators
Post new topic   Reply to topic View previous topicView next topic
22 Posts • Page 2 of 2 • Previous 1, 2
Author Message
drapt@
Poincare Conjecture
Poincare Conjecture

Offline
Joined: 04 Nov 2006
Posts: 166

To rate posts you must be logged in
#21
here is a nice application of the result , prove that if A is symetrique positif matrix then so is the matrix (exp(ai,j))

PostPosted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 7:26 am  Back to top 
  ProfilePM
QuyBac
Riemann Hypothesis
Riemann Hypothesis


Offline
Joined: 30 Jun 2008
Posts: 367
Location: Love Math
Viet Nam

To rate posts you must be logged in
#22
Re: positive definite matrices + kronecker product
my teacher

alekk wrote:
Let A = \left(a_{i,j}\right)_{1\leq i\leq n,\ 1\leq j\leq n} and B = \left(b_{i,j}\right)_{1\leq i\leq n,\ 1\leq j\leq n} be two n\times n positive definite matrices. Show that the matrix C = \left(c_{i,j}\right)_{1\leq i\leq n,\ 1\leq j\leq n} defined by c_{i,j} = a_{i,j}b_{i,j} is also positive definite.
Remark (inserted by moderator). Under a positive definite matrix, we understand a symmetric (or Hermitean, if we work over the complex numbers) matrix U such that x^TUx > 0 (or x^*Ux > 0, respectively) for any nonzero vector x.

By A \in S_n^{ + }(\mathbb{R}) then the exist \omega \in O_n{\mathbb{(R)}} such that : A = \omega D \omega^{T} ("*")
Here \omega = [\omega_{ij}]_{1 \leq i,j \leq n} and \omega^T = [\omega_{ji}]_{1 \leq i,j \leq n} , D = diag(\lambda_1,\lambda_2,..,\lambda_n) ,\lambda_k \geq 0 ,\forall k \in \{1,2,..,n\}
Then easy see from "*" : a_{ij} = \sum_{k = 1}^{n}\sum_{m = 1}^{n}{\omega_{ik}\lambda_{ik}\omega_{jm}} = \sum_{k = 1}^{n}{\lambda_k\omega_{ik}\omega_{... (1)
You known that A \in S_n^{ + }(\mathbb{R}) then \forall x \in M_{n1}{\mathbb{(R)}} then x^TAx \geq 0
Now put y_{ik} = \omega_{ik}x_i,1 \leq i ,j \leq n and y_k = \begin{bmatrix}\omega_{1k}x_1 \\
\omega_{2k}x_2 \\
.... \\
\omega_{nk}x_n \end{bmatrix}=\begin{bmatrix}y_{1k}\\y_{2k}\\... , 1 \leq k \leq n
We have :
x^TCx = \sum_{i = 1}^{n}\sum_{j = 1}^{n}{c_{ij}x_ix_j} = \sum_{i = 1}^{n}\sum_{j = 1}^{n}{b_{ij}(a_{ij}x_ix_j)} = \sum_{i = 1...
By B \in S_n^{ + }(\mathbb{R}),y_k \in M_{n1}{\mathbb{(R)}}.....
You can read a different proof of Elizabeth Million about it but I don't find proof Oppenheim's Inequality can post it Embarassed
With \forall A,B,C \in M_n{\mathbb{(C)}} , C = [a_{ij}b_{ij}]_{1 \leq i,j \leq n} then rank(C) \leq rank(A \otimes{B}) (easy see small matrix)
About Hadamard's Inequality ,A \in S_n^{ + }{\mathbb{(R)}}
Then \det(A) \leq a_{11}a_{22}...a_{nn} You can use lemma A = M^TM,M \in M_n{\mathbb{(R)}} then :
|\det(M)| = |\det(m_1,..,m_n)| \leq ||m_1||...||m_n|| (Hadamard's Inequality ) then easy a_{ii} = \sqrt {||m_i||} , 1 \leq i \leq n ....
You can talk more ? Rotfl
_________________
M^{L}A^{O}T^{V}H^{E}=\sum{LOVE}\sum{MATH} .....Play Ball......

PostPosted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 7:27 pm  Back to top 
  ProfilePMWWWBlog
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
22 Posts • Page 2 of 2 • Previous 1, 2
Post new topic   Reply to topic View previous topicView next topic
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum


© Copyright 2008 AoPS Incorporated. All Rights Reserved. • FoundationPrivacyContact Us