Author
Message
Valentin Vornicu
Admin
Offline Joined: 03 Feb 2003 Posts: 7080 Location: California, US
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
cezar lupu wrote:
excuse me,but i don't understand nothing here.Our tests selection are one of the most difficult
tests in the world,even imo is easier than some problems given at our TSTs.I'm
I think that you are not fully up to date with all this IMO TST thing
_________________ We all use math everyday: to forecast weather, to tell time, to handle money; we also use math to analyze crime, reveal patterns, predict behavior. Using numbers we can solve the biggest mysteries we know.
Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2005 9:16 am
Soarer
Navier-Stokes Equations
Offline Joined: 30 Aug 2003 Posts: 2466
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
and i think the ranking of Uzbekistan is just too good to be true.
Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2005 9:51 am
Cezar Lupu
Navier-Stokes Equations
Offline Joined: 01 May 2005 Posts: 1825 Location: Bucharest/Constanta, Romania
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Yes,Harazi I haven't seen tests selection in China and Russia until now.Unfortunately,you're right.
_________________ In the war, it is NOT the men, but the Man who counts. ( Napoleon Bonaparte)
Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2005 12:23 pm
shobber
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer
Offline Joined: 07 Feb 2005 Posts: 3503 Location: Beijing, China
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
cezar lupu wrote:
Yes,Harazi I haven't seen tests selection in China and Russia until now.Unfortunately,you're right.
So if the Chinese TST is really harder than IMO, then a lot of students who failed to get into the Chinese team may recieve gold in IMO if they all participate. Poor Wpolly.
Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2005 6:16 pm
darktreb
Yang-Mills Theory
Offline Joined: 24 May 2003 Posts: 807 Location: Cambridge, MA
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
harazi wrote:
Cezar, you amaze me! First of all, difficulty of IMO team selection tests is not relevant for the results of the country simply because anyone can give extremely difficult problems in their tests and yet no contestant solves the problems given. Secondly, have you ever seen the TST's from China, Russia, Vietnam, USA? I bet they are a little bit more difficult than ours...
USA wasn't too difficult this year. But some years it can have some very very tough problems (of course, the same goes for the other countries mentioned)
Quote:
So if the Chinese TST is really harder than IMO, then a lot of students who failed to get into the Chinese team may recieve gold in IMO if they all participate. Poor Wpolly. Sad
Very true.
_________________ Why did the zookeeper kick the monkey out of the compact Hausdorff cage?
Because it didn't belong in a Baire space!
Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2005 10:08 pm
Armo
Riemann Hypothesis
Offline Joined: 14 Aug 2004 Posts: 377 Location: Yerevan
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Good luck to aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaall of you guys. I hope we'll see each other there and I hope i'll get many new friends. Wish you all gold medals.
_________________ It is better the river of my life to be wide and short than long and narrow.
Avicena
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2005 11:15 am
Fedor Petrov
Riemann Hypothesis
Offline Joined: 30 Oct 2003 Posts: 460 Location: Saint-Petersburg
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Large prognosis without Russia:
1. China
2. Vietnam
3. Bulgaria
4. Korea
5. Moldova
6. Romania
7. Iran
8. Taiwan
9. USA
10. Belarus
11. Ukraine
12. Israel
13. Japan
14. India
15. Kazakhstan
Posted: Tue Jul 12, 2005 10:06 pm
irakli
New Member
Offline Joined: 12 Jul 2005 Posts: 16 Location: Tbilisi
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Prognose For IMO 2006
1. Bulgaria
2. China
3. Russia
4. Vietnam
5. USA
6. Hungary
7. Romania
8. Moldova
9. South Korea
10. Taiwan
Thats how it will be
_________________ IG.
Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2005 12:55 am
sam-n
Yang-Mills Theory
Offline Joined: 02 Mar 2004 Posts: 790 Location: tehran
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
i hope my country will be in 5 first countries this year after 7 years
Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2005 2:30 am
freemind
Riemann Hypothesis
Offline Joined: 14 Jul 2004 Posts: 332 Location: MIT or Moldova
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
hope moldova will be in the first 10 countries!!!
good luck to all countries, especially Moldova and romania
_________________ The fate of equilibrium is to end the eternity ...
Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2005 5:58 am
Xixas
Riemann Hypothesis
Offline Joined: 02 Oct 2004 Posts: 298 Location: Bremen
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
My prognosis:
1. China
2. Russia
3. USA
4. Moldova
5. Bulgaria
6. Romania
7. Vietnam
_________________ Kęstutis Česnavičius
Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2005 11:10 am
al.M.V.
Riemann Hypothesis
Offline Joined: 01 Jul 2004 Posts: 352 Location: Canada
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
yeah, i agree with Xixas on the countries for the top 3.
_________________ Just let me have all the M.E.T.B. like M.V.!
Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2005 2:57 pm
shobber
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer
Offline Joined: 07 Feb 2005 Posts: 3503 Location: Beijing, China
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Problems are easy. So any predictions of the cut line?
Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2005 5:34 pm
lego
New Member
Offline Joined: 31 Jan 2005 Posts: 11 Location: Cambridge, MA
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
shobber wrote:
Problems are easy. So any predictions of the cut line?
the same it was in 1987
Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2005 6:20 pm
shobber
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer
Offline Joined: 07 Feb 2005 Posts: 3503 Location: Beijing, China
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
lego wrote:
shobber wrote:
Problems are easy. So any predictions of the cut line?
the same it was in 1987
Huh?
Is the problems of 1987 as easy as this time?
Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2005 6:36 pm
DPopov
Navier-Stokes Equations
Offline Joined: 21 Aug 2004 Posts: 1410 Location: Texas, USA
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
I don't know but I'm rooting for Bulgaria; somehow I don't think they will have messed up on the first day's problems since they seemed particularly easy.
_________________
AoPS is AWE
Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2005 10:13 pm
manuel
Yang-Mills Theory
Offline Joined: 18 Jul 2004 Posts: 748
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
i predict the gold cut like 36
Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2005 10:19 pm
Xixas
Riemann Hypothesis
Offline Joined: 02 Oct 2004 Posts: 298 Location: Bremen
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
I think 36 for gold, 27 for silver and 17 for bronze.
_________________ Kęstutis Česnavičius
Posted: Fri Jul 15, 2005 6:18 am
tranvinhphuctk14
New Member
Offline Joined: 15 Jul 2005 Posts: 13
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
I think Vietnamese will win. Because Union, Union.
Posted: Fri Jul 15, 2005 7:54 pm
Valentin Vornicu
Admin
Offline Joined: 03 Feb 2003 Posts: 7080 Location: California, US
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Xixas wrote:
I think 36 for gold, 27 for silver and 17 for bronze.
I think you are giving some of the students too much credit
_________________ We all use math everyday: to forecast weather, to tell time, to handle money; we also use math to analyze crime, reveal patterns, predict behavior. Using numbers we can solve the biggest mysteries we know.
Posted: Sat Jul 16, 2005 6:44 am
Display posts from previous: All Posts 1 Day 7 Days 2 Weeks 1 Month 3 Months 6 Months 1 Year Sort by: Post Time Post Subject Author Ascending Descending