Community

Want to learn how to tackle those tough AMC/AIME/Olympiad counting and probability problems? Check out Art of Problem Solving's Intermediate Counting & Probability by David Patrick.
Login Register Memberlist Search AoPS Blogs Contests Galleries Forum Index
The time now is Fri Dec 04, 2009 10:06 am
All times are UTC - 8
View posts since last visit
View unanswered posts
Error in AoPs Sol.'s Vol. 1, Problem 298?
Moderators: Peter
Post new topic   Reply to topic View previous topicView next topic
4 Posts • Page 1 of 1
Author Message
EFuzzy
Riemann Hypothesis
Riemann Hypothesis

Offline
Joined: 31 May 2004
Posts: 389
Location: Maryland, USA
United States

To rate posts you must be logged in
#1
Error in AoPs Sol.'s Vol. 1, Problem 298?

In the fifth edition solutions manual, it uses the formula (a+b-c)/2 for the inradius of a right triangle, on an 8-13-17 triangle. But 8-13-17 triangles aren't right. Is this a typo?
_________________
Go KSEG! Free Geometry!

http://www.mit.edu/~ibaran/kseg.html

PostPosted: Sun Jan 23, 2005 3:51 pm  Back to top 
  ProfilePMAIMBlog
RC-7th
Navier-Stokes Equations
Navier-Stokes Equations


Offline
Joined: 26 May 2004
Posts: 1294
Location: Virginia
United States

To rate posts you must be logged in
#2
Re: Error in AoPs Sol.'s Vol. 1, Problem 298?

EFuzzy wrote:
In the fifth edition solutions manual, it uses the formula (a+b-c)/2 for the inradius of a right triangle, on an 8-13-17 triangle. But 8-13-17 triangles aren't right. Is this a typo?


Notice that r and s don't stand for the radius and semiperimeter. I think it's right.
_________________
Nothing in life is impossible,... except: Slamming a revolving door; Clapping with one hand; Striking a match against wet toilet paper; Swallowing while you're talking;

PostPosted: Sun Jan 23, 2005 5:03 pm  Back to top 
  ProfilePMBlog
Ravi B
Navier-Stokes Equations
Navier-Stokes Equations

Offline
Joined: 23 Jun 2003
Posts: 2464
Location: New York City
IndiaUnited States

To rate posts you must be logged in
#3
Yes, the book is right. EFuzzy, see Example 17-3.

PostPosted: Sun Jan 23, 2005 5:06 pm  Back to top 
  ProfilePMWWWBlog
EFuzzy
Riemann Hypothesis
Riemann Hypothesis

Offline
Joined: 31 May 2004
Posts: 389
Location: Maryland, USA
United States

To rate posts you must be logged in
#4
Oh OK, I somehow overlooked example 17-3. Blush Thanks!
_________________
Go KSEG! Free Geometry!

http://www.mit.edu/~ibaran/kseg.html

PostPosted: Sun Jan 23, 2005 7:23 pm  Back to top 
  ProfilePMAIMBlog
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
4 Posts • Page 1 of 1
Post new topic   Reply to topic View previous topicView next topic
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum


© Copyright 2008 AoPS Incorporated. All Rights Reserved. • FoundationPrivacyContact Us