Author
Message
manlio
Navier-Stokes Equations
Offline Joined: 28 Apr 2004 Posts: 2069 Location: Italy
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Harazi ineq Harazi
For positive reals such that prove that
Posted: Mon Jan 31, 2005 10:53 am
zhaobin
Navier-Stokes Equations
Offline Joined: 11 Jan 2005 Posts: 2229 Location: China Zhejiang province Ningbo
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
we can hvae right?
Posted: Mon Jan 31, 2005 11:00 am
manlio
Navier-Stokes Equations
Offline Joined: 28 Apr 2004 Posts: 2069 Location: Italy
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Myth said to me that
if and he never makes mistakes , so it is true that
but I cannot prove it
Posted: Mon Jan 31, 2005 11:10 am
manlio
Navier-Stokes Equations
Offline Joined: 28 Apr 2004 Posts: 2069 Location: Italy
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Perhaps it is better to write
for
Posted: Mon Jan 31, 2005 11:20 am
zhaobin
Navier-Stokes Equations
Offline Joined: 11 Jan 2005 Posts: 2229 Location: China Zhejiang province Ningbo
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
it is my proof here. let
we can get ,then if
we can have the contradiction
Posted: Mon Jan 31, 2005 11:37 am
manlio
Navier-Stokes Equations
Offline Joined: 28 Apr 2004 Posts: 2069 Location: Italy
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
You have
with
or
If
then
so
or
Why is this a contradiction?
Posted: Mon Jan 31, 2005 12:11 pm
zhaobin
Navier-Stokes Equations
Offline Joined: 11 Jan 2005 Posts: 2229 Location: China Zhejiang province Ningbo
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
,then if
we have
use
we can have the cantradiction.sorry for my unclear post last time.
Posted: Mon Jan 31, 2005 12:47 pm
manlio
Navier-Stokes Equations
Offline Joined: 28 Apr 2004 Posts: 2069 Location: Italy
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Thank you very much , zhaobin.
It is correct and very nice.
Posted: Mon Jan 31, 2005 1:22 pm
zhaobin
Navier-Stokes Equations
Offline Joined: 11 Jan 2005 Posts: 2229 Location: China Zhejiang province Ningbo
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
manlio wrote:
Thank you very much , zhaobin.
It is correct and very nice.
My thought is from 41st-imo.
if I rememeber correctly.
Posted: Mon Jan 31, 2005 2:17 pm
nttu
Riemann Hypothesis
Offline Joined: 28 Jun 2004 Posts: 489 Location: Ho Chi Minh city
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
I have an easier way :
The ineq is equivalent to
We have :
We will prove
(1)
Fortunately ,
_________________ Nguyen Tuan Tu
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2005 1:19 am
Display posts from previous: All Posts 1 Day 7 Days 2 Weeks 1 Month 3 Months 6 Months 1 Year Sort by: Post Time Post Subject Author Ascending Descending