Community

Looking for a challenging geometry text? Preparing for MATHCOUNTS or the AMC exams? Check out Art of Problem Solving's Introduction to Geometry by Richard Rusczyk.
Login Register Memberlist Search AoPS Blogs Contests Galleries Forum Index
The time now is Wed Dec 02, 2009 3:11 am
All times are UTC - 8
View posts since last visit
View unanswered posts
Equality with factorial: m(m+1)(m+2)=n!
Moderators: High School Olympiad Moderators, amfulger, Arne, darij grinberg, freemind, harazi, Megus, N.T.TUAN, orl, pbornsztein, ZetaX
Post new topic   Reply to topic View previous topicView next topic
5 Posts • Page 1 of 1
Author Message
EUCLA
Poincare Conjecture
Poincare Conjecture


Offline
Joined: 13 Mar 2005
Posts: 187
Location: Prato, Toscana, Italy
Italy

To rate posts you must be logged in
#1
Equality with factorial: m(m+1)(m+2)=n!

Find all couples (m,n) of integers such that m(m + 1)(m + 2) = n!
_________________
La guida al guado del fiume, Teeteto, diceva: sarà l'acqua stessa a mostrare quanto è profonda.
Platone, Thaet.

PostPosted: Tue Aug 11, 2009 4:12 am  Back to top 
  ProfilePMMSN
Bugi
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer

Offline
Joined: 26 Jun 2008
Posts: 2522
Serbia

To rate posts you must be logged in
#2
Small cases: m=1,n=3;m=2,n=4;m=4,n=5.

It's kind of easy to prove that m(m+1)(m+2)<(m+1)! for m>4.

So, m(m+1)(m+2)\ge m!. That means (m+1)(m+2)\ge (m-1)!. Again easily we can prove that this is possible only for m\le 5, so it must be m=5. But, that case doesn't give solutions, so all solutions are the small cases above.

PostPosted: Tue Aug 11, 2009 12:11 pm  Back to top 
  ProfilePM
Rofler
Yang-Mills Theory
Yang-Mills Theory

Offline
Joined: 10 Mar 2007
Posts: 572

To rate posts you must be logged in
#3
How does m(m + 1)(m + 2) < (m + 1)! imply m(m + 1)(m + 2)\ge m! ?

PostPosted: Tue Aug 11, 2009 4:54 pm  Back to top 
  ProfilePM
fermat285
New Member
New Member

Offline
Joined: 03 Apr 2009
Posts: 4

To rate posts you must be logged in
#4
Bugi//How can you explain m=8, n=6?

PostPosted: Sun Aug 30, 2009 11:28 pm  Back to top 
  ProfilePM
jestrada
New Member
New Member

Offline
Joined: 26 Sep 2009
Posts: 3

To rate posts you must be logged in
#5
what about trying to prove that if m>8, m must be infinitely large?
for example if m>8, then n>6, so n is at least 7 and 5040 divides m(m+1)(m+2) ==> m≥54, because we would have that 16 divides m(m+1)(m+2), 35 divides m(m+1)(m+2) and 9divides m(m+1)(m+2) and the smallest m that fulfills this is 54.
==> 27 divides n!, which implies n≥9, and so on...

PostPosted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 2:26 pm  Back to top 
  ProfilePM
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
5 Posts • Page 1 of 1
Post new topic   Reply to topic View previous topicView next topic
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum


© Copyright 2008 AoPS Incorporated. All Rights Reserved. • FoundationPrivacyContact Us