Author
Message
peine
Riemann Hypothesis
Offline Joined: 07 Aug 2008 Posts: 280
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
my solution is also with a lot of calculs, then you can post your solution.
_________________ the life is the translation of our ideas;
Mohamed El-Alami
Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2009 3:55 am
hasan4444
Riemann Hypothesis
Offline Joined: 28 Nov 2008 Posts: 486
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
OK sorry "peine" but this is a Pre-Olympiad marathon and calculus is not really welcomed
Looking forward for your next post
_________________
New
"Inequalities Marathon" join it now
Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2009 5:03 am
enndb0x
Yang-Mills Theory
Offline Joined: 20 Jan 2009 Posts: 519 Location: Kosovo ,Norway
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
solution to problem 132
Let
and sure
.Then we're looking to minimize the function
Function
is increasing in
so in the interval
the minimum occur for
We do not need to find
, we just use
,since
,and because equality occur for
For
,we have
Thus the searched minimum is
I hope I have no mistakes in calculations ,but anyway this is the idea.
Problem 133 .Let be four positive real number with sum .Prove that
\[
Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2009 6:02 am
Obel1x
Poincare Conjecture
Offline Joined: 24 Apr 2009 Posts: 158 Location: Kosovo
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
solution to 133
First notice that:
since
and we get:
Problem 134. (edited)
If are positive numbers prove that:
_________________ Be faithful in small things because it is in them that your strength lies - Mother Teresa
Last edited by Obel1x on Sat Oct 31, 2009 10:49 am; edited 1 time in total
Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2009 9:30 am
peine
Riemann Hypothesis
Offline Joined: 07 Aug 2008 Posts: 280
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
I don't see the problem 134, anyway this is another solution to problem 133, I wan a post it before that but I had a problem in conexion
another solution to problem 133 we have the function ,
is convex and decreasing in
then from Jensen,
and
then:
and because that
and f is decreasing we get:
to Hassan: I'm sorry for the last inequality that I post
_________________ the life is the translation of our ideas;
Mohamed El-Alami
Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2009 9:47 am
Abdek
Hodge Conjecture
Offline Joined: 22 Aug 2009 Posts: 59 Location: Morocco,oujda
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Solution to problem 134:
By cauchy shwraz inequality we have :
Which is equivalent to :
And hence it remains to prove that:
which is equivalent to
which is true .
Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2009 1:07 pm
Abdek
Hodge Conjecture
Offline Joined: 22 Aug 2009 Posts: 59 Location: Morocco,oujda
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Problem :135
Let . Prove that:
Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2009 1:18 pm
peine
Riemann Hypothesis
Offline Joined: 07 Aug 2008 Posts: 280
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
solution to problem 135 the inequality is equivalent as:
by AM-GM two times, we have,
equality holds when
Problem 136: (Mohamed El-Alami)
let be positive real numbers, prove that:
_________________ the life is the translation of our ideas;
Mohamed El-Alami
Last edited by peine on Sun Nov 01, 2009 2:56 am; edited 1 time in total
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 2:10 am
Pain rinnegan
Poincare Conjecture
Offline Joined: 16 Apr 2009 Posts: 176
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Look at the first problem in this marathon
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 2:29 am
peine
Riemann Hypothesis
Offline Joined: 07 Aug 2008 Posts: 280
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
I'm sorry It was a mistake, it's edited now
_________________ the life is the translation of our ideas;
Mohamed El-Alami
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 2:58 am
geniusbliss
Riemann Hypothesis
Offline Joined: 09 Feb 2009 Posts: 270 Location: chennai,india
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
this is equivalent to the japan tst 2004(note which was later in 2009 copied in AMTI Inter )
i shall post a new inequality-
Problem 137
Prove that for all nonegative reals we have ,
see this link for the problem posted by peine: http://www.artofproblemsolving.com/Forum/viewtopic.php?search_id=1520533121&t=25780
or this one - http://www.artofproblemsolving.com/Forum/viewtopic.php?search_id=105567310&t=209772
Last edited by geniusbliss on Sun Nov 01, 2009 4:58 am; edited 1 time in total
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 4:27 am
b.s.o
New Member
Offline Joined: 28 Oct 2009 Posts: 14
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Solution to problem 136
With AM-GM we have :
So we have only to prove :
We consider :
L'inequality becomes:
and ,
because
the same thing for :
and
And finally :
Last edited by b.s.o on Sun Nov 01, 2009 1:24 pm; edited 1 time in total
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 4:41 am
b.s.o
New Member
Offline Joined: 28 Oct 2009 Posts: 14
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Sorry i didn't see the new problem
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 4:54 am
hasan4444
Riemann Hypothesis
Offline Joined: 28 Nov 2008 Posts: 486
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
geniusbliss wrote:
this is equivalent to the japan tst 2004(note which was later in 2009 copied in AMTI Inter )
i shall post a new inequality-
I'm getting tired again how many time should I repeat this for you "geniusbliss" enough is enough again you didn't put a solution and your excuse that it is equivalent to whatever, then so do you really think that all the inequalities so far are own 100% really?! I really wish to block you from posting here but uncooperative admins are not helping me.
Yes and don't now post a new post for another silly thing OK. You have a solution or a problem or a creative post do it otherwise stay back.
However, this is the pending problem:
Problem 136
Prove that for all nonegative reals we have ,
Have Fun Mathematicians!!!
_________________
New
"Inequalities Marathon" join it now
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 4:58 am
Pain rinnegan
Poincare Conjecture
Offline Joined: 16 Apr 2009 Posts: 176
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
b.s.o wrote:
L'inequality becomes:
I think you're wrong in this step .
b.s.o wrote:
This is true only if a,b,c are sidelenghts of a triangle .
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 5:00 am
geniusbliss
Riemann Hypothesis
Offline Joined: 09 Feb 2009 Posts: 270 Location: chennai,india
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
@hasan i am very sorry
ok sorry guess nobody can be more dumb than me -
anyway
why it is equivalent-
the japan tst is -
for and positive reals prove that
write and ,
so the LHS becomes now divide the LHS and RHS by 2 and we get -
since the inequality posted by peine is homogenous we assume that
so the inequalities are equivalent.
solution to 136
we have to prove that ,
or,
by Cauchy,
and the last inequality is by AM-GM for positive reals
solution to 137
(not mine)
let
,
then we substitute
to
since
are non-negative reals,
we observe that the LHS of the inequality gets decreased (from
to
) as one of the factors and the other factor is unaltered
Also that the RHS remains the same
so we are done if we prove this new inequality instead of the earlier one.
after the substituion the inequality becomes -
for this: By AM- GM we have
therefore,
(note that the last inequality has an equality case as
are non-negative.)
thus proved,with equality for
@hasan
i am very sorry dude.
_________________
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes
Mathematical Dreams
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 5:20 am
hasan4444
Riemann Hypothesis
Offline Joined: 28 Nov 2008 Posts: 486
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Problem 138 Gabriel Dospinescu, Marian Tetiva
Problem 138: Let such that
Prove that
_________________
New
"Inequalities Marathon" join it now
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 5:11 am
peine
Riemann Hypothesis
Offline Joined: 07 Aug 2008 Posts: 280
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
very nice problem, hope someone find a solution nicer than mine,
Solution to problem 138:
Let
and let find
we have
then:
we have the function
is increasing in
and we have
and
then
with
,
(easy to prove)
and from that we can easly verify that
is maximal in
when
from where we deduct that
equality holds when
Problem 139: (Mohamed El-Alami)
Let be positive real numbers, find the greatest constant such as:
P.S: I found this result today, hope that was really my own result.
_________________ the life is the translation of our ideas;
Mohamed El-Alami
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 2:40 pm
Abdek
Hodge Conjecture
Offline Joined: 22 Aug 2009 Posts: 59 Location: Morocco,oujda
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Solution to problem 139:
Nice problem my friend
your inequality is equivalent to :
by the two flowing identities and
The inequality can be written as :
which is by AM_GM
_________________ Mharchi Abdelmalek
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 4:47 am
Abdek
Hodge Conjecture
Offline Joined: 22 Aug 2009 Posts: 59 Location: Morocco,oujda
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Problem 140:
For show that :
_________________ Mharchi Abdelmalek
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 5:09 am
Display posts from previous: All Posts 1 Day 7 Days 2 Weeks 1 Month 3 Months 6 Months 1 Year Sort by: Post Time Post Subject Author Ascending Descending