Community

Want to learn how to tackle those tough AMC/AIME/Olympiad counting and probability problems? Check out Art of Problem Solving's Intermediate Counting & Probability by David Patrick.
Login Register Memberlist Search AoPS Blogs Contests Galleries Forum Index
The time now is Fri Nov 20, 2009 11:48 pm
All times are UTC - 8
View posts since last visit
View unanswered posts
Not difficult but interesting inequality
Moderators: High School Olympiad Moderators, Arne, blahblahblah, Cezar Lupu, darij grinberg, harazi, Megus, N.T.TUAN, orl, pbornsztein, pvthuan
Post new topic   Reply to topic View previous topicView next topic
6 Posts • Page 1 of 1
Author Message
manlio
Navier-Stokes Equations
Navier-Stokes Equations

Offline
Joined: 28 Apr 2004
Posts: 2061
Location: Italy

To rate posts you must be logged in
#1
Not difficult but interesting inequality

Let x_k (k=1,2,..,n) be real positive numbers such that x_1+..+x_n=1.
Prove that

\sum (k=1,..,n)(x_k+1/x_k)^2 \geq (n+1)^a/n^(a-1)

for every real number a>0.

PostPosted: Mon Jan 12, 2004 10:36 am  Back to top 
  ProfilePM
pbornsztein
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer

Offline
Joined: 10 Oct 2003
Posts: 2981
Location: Paris, France
France

To rate posts you must be logged in
#2
This is not true for x_ = 1/n for i=1,...,n, and for a sufficientely large since in that case the LHS is (1+n 2 ) 2 /n and the RHS is n( 1+1/n) a .
Thus the RHS is a non bounded from above function of a....

Pierre.

PostPosted: Mon Jan 12, 2004 1:39 pm  Back to top 
  ProfilePM
manlio
Navier-Stokes Equations
Navier-Stokes Equations

Offline
Joined: 28 Apr 2004
Posts: 2061
Location: Italy

To rate posts you must be logged in
#3
Sorry, the correct inequality is



\sum (k=1,..,n)(x_k+1/x_k)^a \geq (n^2+1)^a/n^(a-1)



Sorry, again.

PostPosted: Mon Jan 12, 2004 2:00 pm  Back to top 
  ProfilePM
pbornsztein
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer

Offline
Joined: 10 Oct 2003
Posts: 2981
Location: Paris, France
France

To rate posts you must be logged in
#4
Hmmm...are you sure about the fact that it holds for all a > 0?
I would say a \geq 1.

Pierre.

PostPosted: Mon Jan 12, 2004 2:21 pm  Back to top 
  ProfilePM
manlio
Navier-Stokes Equations
Navier-Stokes Equations

Offline
Joined: 28 Apr 2004
Posts: 2061
Location: Italy

To rate posts you must be logged in
#5
This inequality is valid for a \geq 0 and it is reversed for 0>a \geq -1.

PostPosted: Mon Jan 12, 2004 2:42 pm  Back to top 
  ProfilePM
Mamat
Poincare Conjecture
Poincare Conjecture

Offline
Joined: 26 Sep 2004
Posts: 189
Kyrgyzstan

To rate posts you must be logged in
#6
I think we can solve this inequality by using Jensen's inequality.

PostPosted: Wed Feb 23, 2005 3:23 pm  Back to top 
  ProfilePMBlog
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
6 Posts • Page 1 of 1
Post new topic   Reply to topic View previous topicView next topic
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum


© Copyright 2008 AoPS Incorporated. All Rights Reserved. • FoundationPrivacyContact Us