Community

Want to learn how to tackle those tough MATHCOUNTS and AMC counting and probability problems? Check out Art of Problem Solving's Introduction to Counting & Probability by David Patrick.
Login Register Memberlist Search AoPS Blogs Contests Galleries Forum Index
The time now is Mon Dec 07, 2009 9:53 pm
All times are UTC - 8
View posts since last visit
View unanswered posts
Inequality
Moderators: Pre-Olympiad Moderators
Post new topic   Reply to topic View previous topicView next topic
6 Posts • Page 1 of 1
Author Message
triplebig
Riemann Hypothesis
Riemann Hypothesis


Offline
Joined: 04 Apr 2008
Posts: 250
Brazil

To rate posts you must be logged in
#1
Inequality
a+b+c=5 and ab+bc+ac=3

If a + b + c = 5 and ab + bc + ac = 3

prove that - 1\leq c\leq \frac {13}{3}

EDIT: a,b,c\in\mathbb{R}
Last edited by triplebig on Thu Nov 05, 2009 4:59 am; edited 1 time in total 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 3:19 am  Back to top 
  ProfilePM
aadil
Riemann Hypothesis
Riemann Hypothesis


Offline
Joined: 18 Sep 2008
Posts: 430
Location: chennai

To rate posts you must be logged in
#2
what are a,b ?can they be negative
_________________
Rotfl Play Ball Star Wars quantum mechanics-the gem of physics

PostPosted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 4:57 am  Back to top 
  ProfilePMBlog
triplebig
Riemann Hypothesis
Riemann Hypothesis


Offline
Joined: 04 Apr 2008
Posts: 250
Brazil

To rate posts you must be logged in
#3
a,b,c are real numbers.

PostPosted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 4:59 am  Back to top 
  ProfilePM
darkmage2009
Hodge Conjecture
Hodge Conjecture

Offline
Joined: 02 Jun 2009
Posts: 50
Location: Augusta, GA

To rate posts you must be logged in
#4
This is not a rigorous or formal proof. It's also somewhat incomplete. It involves calculus as well.
Click to reveal hidden content

We can let a,b,c to be roots of a monic polynomial f(x). By Vieta's Laws, f(x)=x^3-5x^2+3x-k, where k=abc. Looking at the graph of f, we notice that it has a relative maximum and a relative minimum, so we must restrict k such that the relative maximum is greater than or equal to 0 and the relative minimum is less than or equal to 0 to ensure we have 3 real roots.

We can find the x-coordinates of the maximum and minimum, which are not based on the value of k. We take the derivative of f(x) and obtain f'(x)=3x^2-10x+3=(3x-1)(x-3). We set f'(x) equal to zero to find that the maximum occurs at x=\frac{1}{3} and the minimum occurs at x=3. For f(\frac{1}{3})\geq0, k\geq-\frac{13}{27} and for f(3)\leq0, k\leq9.

When f(\frac{1}{3})=0, let a=\frac{1}{3} and b=\frac{1}{3}. (If c is one of them, then the inequality obviously holds since -1<\frac{1}{3}<\frac{13}{3}.) Then c must equal \frac{13}{3} by the conditions given. When f(3)=0, let a=3 and b=3. (If c is one of them, then the inequality obviously holds since -1<3<\frac{13}{3}.) Then c must equal -1 by the conditions given.

_________________
1+1=2 in base 10, and 1+1=10 in base 2. Coincidence? I think not!

PostPosted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 12:29 pm  Back to top 
  ProfilePM
Brut3Forc3
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer


Offline
Joined: 23 Sep 2007
Posts: 2557
Location: Irvine, CA
ChinaUnited States

To rate posts you must be logged in
#5
Click to reveal hidden content
The first equation gives a+b=5-c, and the second gives ab+(a+b)c=3. Plugging in for a+b, we have ab+(5-c)c=3, or ab=c^2-5c+3.
We have that a,b are the roots of x^2-(5-c)x+(c^2-5c+3), which has discriminant (5-c)^2-4(c^2-5c+3)=-3c^2+10c+13=-(c+1)(3c-13). This discriminant must be nonnegative for a,b to be real, so we have -1\le c \le \frac{13}{3}, as desired.

_________________
"I can stand brute force, but brute reason is quite unbearable. There is something unfair about its use. It is hitting below the intellect." - Oscar Wilde

PostPosted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 8:51 pm  Back to top 
  ProfilePMBlog
kunny
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer


Offline
Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Posts: 9649
Location: Japan
Japan

To rate posts you must be logged in
#6
Those solution are correct.

Remark:

\boxed{\boxed{a,\ b\in\mathbb{R}\Longleftrightarrow a+b,\ a-b\in\mathbb{R}}}
_________________
Today's calculation of Integral Digest

PostPosted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 9:02 pm  Back to top 
  ProfilePM
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
6 Posts • Page 1 of 1
Post new topic   Reply to topic View previous topicView next topic
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum


© Copyright 2008 AoPS Incorporated. All Rights Reserved. • FoundationPrivacyContact Us