Author
Message
fleeting_guest
Yang-Mills Theory
Offline Joined: 14 Dec 2004 Posts: 900
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Virtual score of former USSR? China vs ex-USSR
What is the score of the top 6 students from ex-USSR (Russia + formerly Soviet republics)
Does Russia place #1 if one of its students is replaced by the perfect scorer from Moldova?
Edit: If the two lowest scores of Russia (28 and 30) are replaced by 42 and 42 from Moldova and Ukraine,
one gets 6 gold medals and a total score of 236, one higher than China.
However, one could argue that this is not necessarily the team that would have been selected and we are choosing after the competition.
It would be interesting to take the results of all students from the ex-Soviet territories, assume some randomness in selecting the top students, and see what is the probability that Russia is #1.
Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2005 11:48 am
hello
Riemann Hypothesis
Offline Joined: 05 Aug 2003 Posts: 458 Location: Pennsylvania, USA
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Fleeting guest! You are correct! The dominence of USSR mathematics at work!!
_________________ Michael
Mathematics is the the only subject of study in the world where proof cannot be argued against.
Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2005 4:56 pm
blahblahblah
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer
Offline Joined: 28 Mar 2004 Posts: 3757
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
hello wrote:
Fleeting guest! You are correct! The dominence of USSR mathematics at work!!
Come on, be at least semi-relevant.
Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2005 6:18 pm
fleeting_guest
Yang-Mills Theory
Offline Joined: 14 Dec 2004 Posts: 900
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Another question (more speculative) is whether any provinces in China could send a top 10 IMO team, or what would happen if China sent additional teams from its students ranked 7-12, 13-18, etc.
Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2005 6:31 pm
manuel
Yang-Mills Theory
Offline Joined: 18 Jul 2004 Posts: 748
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Why are russians better mathematicians in the future than chinese or asian?
i mean, maybe im wront but this is what i've seen a bit. the strong research professors in math are usually russians or eastern european.
is this because chinese and aisan people are more techinical in solving problems and dedicate more time to algebra and more technical areas and the russians are more creative in their approach and they focus more in combinatorics ?
Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2005 6:34 pm
chika
New Member
Offline Joined: 20 Jul 2005 Posts: 1 Location: CT
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
cool. some of you guys are talking about "virtual score" well, why don't we talk about virtual score of china?
taiwan is recognized as part of china by most of the world.(yet, i don't wanna talk about the historical argument for now)
china has 4 perfect scorers while taiwan has 2. then you guys do the maths. does former USSR still beat china?
by the way, hongkong did pretty well,too.
china ranked no.1 8 times and no country has beaten china twice since 1995. (didn't check the stats before 1995)
well, there are many reasons why the chinese mathematicians aren't as good as those in europe and north america, such as low quality education in the chinese universities, but it's definitely not because they're not clever enough.
Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2005 12:34 am
shobber
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer
Offline Joined: 07 Feb 2005 Posts: 3503 Location: Beijing, China
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
chika wrote:
well, there are many reasons why the chinese mathematicians aren't as good as those in europe and north america, such as low quality education in the chinese universities, but it's definitely not because they're not clever enough.
Big difference between doing IMO well and becoming an outstanding mathematician.
Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2005 1:31 am
Fedor Petrov
Riemann Hypothesis
Offline Joined: 30 Oct 2003 Posts: 459 Location: Saint-Petersburg
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
manuel wrote:
Why are russians better mathematicians in the future than chinese or asian?
i mean, maybe im wront but this is what i've seen a bit. the strong research professors in math are usually russians or eastern european.
is this because chinese and aisan people are more techinical in solving problems and dedicate more time to algebra and more technical areas and the russians are more creative in their approach and they focus more in combinatorics ?
I think, it is rather because strong research professors are little bit older than IMO participants, and some 20 years ago, or more, Asians did not dominate on IMO. So, just wait few years, and the percentage of Asian, especially Chinese, researchers, must increase much.
Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2005 1:50 am
shobber
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer
Offline Joined: 07 Feb 2005 Posts: 3503 Location: Beijing, China
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
My record shows that:
1988 USSR: 217 China: 201
1989 China: 237 USSR: 217
1990 China: 230 USSR: 193
1991 USSR: 241 China: 231
Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2005 1:54 am
Fedor Petrov
Riemann Hypothesis
Offline Joined: 30 Oct 2003 Posts: 459 Location: Saint-Petersburg
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Re: Virtual score of former USSR? China vs ex-USSR
fleeting_guest wrote:
What is the score of the top 6 students from ex-USSR (Russia + formerly Soviet republics)
42(BLR)+42(MDA)+42(RUS)+42(UKR)+41(RUS)+38(UKR)=247. However, less than China plus their best friends Taiwan.
Last edited by Fedor Petrov on Wed Jul 20, 2005 9:51 am; edited 1 time in total
Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2005 1:57 am
Valentin Vornicu
Admin
Offline Joined: 03 Feb 2003 Posts: 7080 Location: California, US
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Re: Virtual score of former USSR? China vs ex-USSR
Fedor Petrov wrote:
However, less then China plus their best friends Taiwan.
this was a good one Fedor!
_________________ We all use math everyday: to forecast weather, to tell time, to handle money; we also use math to analyze crime, reveal patterns, predict behavior. Using numbers we can solve the biggest mysteries we know.
Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2005 9:48 am
hello
Riemann Hypothesis
Offline Joined: 05 Aug 2003 Posts: 458 Location: Pennsylvania, USA
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
I dont understand what u mean Fedor? Chto ti imeyesh vidu Fedor? Ya xochu chtobi oni ne ponili chto ya napisal, ti bil na imo?
_________________ Michael
Mathematics is the the only subject of study in the world where proof cannot be argued against.
Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2005 5:38 pm
Fedor Petrov
Riemann Hypothesis
Offline Joined: 30 Oct 2003 Posts: 459 Location: Saint-Petersburg
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Hello, I do not mean nothing special. I just sum up best 6 six results of post-Soviet contestants and get 247. For China nad Taiwan, it is .
All questions in Russian are welcome either in Russian subforum or by e-mail.
Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2005 11:02 pm
Yossarian
P versus NP
Offline Joined: 16 Oct 2004 Posts: 49 Location: Ithaca
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Re: Virtual score of former USSR? China vs ex-USSR
Valentin Vornicu wrote:
Fedor Petrov wrote:
However, less then China plus their best friends Taiwan.
this was a good one Fedor!
We ate a number of meals with the Taiwan deputy. Once we sat down at a table with him and two observers (red-tags, very recognisable) and I thought they were Taiwanese observers. Upon closer inspection... One (maybe both) was actually PRC! They seemed to be chatting very happily.
Seriously, I do believe that they ARE generally friendly towards each other, except for the politicians.
_________________ Fine. Thanks. Overworked as usual. You?
Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2005 1:50 am
Zubr
Hodge Conjecture
Offline Joined: 13 Jan 2005 Posts: 72 Location: Minsk, Belarus
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
What about Belarus, LEVIN (BLR4) HAS 42 AND BELARUS was in USSR!
Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2005 4:03 am
Xixas
Riemann Hypothesis
Offline Joined: 02 Oct 2004 Posts: 298 Location: Bremen
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Well done, Levin and all Belarussian team!
_________________ Kęstutis Česnavičius
Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2005 10:22 am
qxy
Hodge Conjecture
Offline Joined: 19 Nov 2004 Posts: 97 Location: NanJing Normal University
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
manuel wrote:
Why are russians better mathematicians in the future than chinese or asian?
i mean, maybe im wront but this is what i've seen a bit. the strong research professors in math are usually russians or eastern european.
is this because chinese and aisan people are more techinical in solving problems and dedicate more time to algebra and more technical areas and the russians are more creative in their approach and they focus more in combinatorics ?
I don't think so. The mainland China didn't realise to develop its science until 1976. Many scientists and mathematicians are still very young. Also, many young men filled with talent have gone abroad especially USA.
Posted: Mon Aug 01, 2005 10:50 pm
manuel
Yang-Mills Theory
Offline Joined: 18 Jul 2004 Posts: 748
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
maybe i'm a bit ignorant but, what i've seen in the strong math departments of the world's university is eastern european names and russian names..
few asian..
though obviuosly there are some excellent asian mathematicians..
but i think the difference come when the asians see math more as a science and tend to be more technical (you said 'scientists and mathematicians') and there research might be complicated and good but they might lack of the aesthetic sense...
in the other hand, russians and eastern europeans.. are known for their beautiful, brilliant , artistic and direct results in math..
you can see this for example china is known for their algebra strength (a more linear way of thinking) and russia is known for their strenght in combinatorics (ingenious ideas)
Posted: Tue Aug 02, 2005 7:27 pm
fleeting_guest
Yang-Mills Theory
Offline Joined: 14 Dec 2004 Posts: 900
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
Fedor Petrov wrote:
manuel wrote:
Why are russians better mathematicians in the future than chinese or asian?
i mean, maybe im wront but this is what i've seen a bit. the strong research professors in math are usually russians or eastern european.
is this because chinese and aisan people are more techinical in solving problems and dedicate more time to algebra and more technical areas and the russians are more creative in their approach and they focus more in combinatorics ?
I think, it is rather because strong research professors are little bit older than IMO participants, and some 20 years ago, or more, Asians did not dominate on IMO. So, just wait few years, and the percentage of Asian, especially Chinese, researchers, must increase much.
The Russian mathematicians who are dominant generally did not get there through the IMO, but by surviving a much more extreme Darwinian selection at the Moscow seminars of Gelfand, Manin, and some others. The same pattern is true with Chinese students, the ones who become amazing are generally students of people like Chern and Yau and others at that level. Chinese IMO champions are doing well, but not amazingly well, in research mathematics.
Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2005 2:19 pm
manuel
Yang-Mills Theory
Offline Joined: 18 Jul 2004 Posts: 748
Not_yet_rated
Poor (Spam)
Poor (Spam)
Below average
Below average
Average
Average
Good
Good
Very good
Very good
Excellent
To rate posts you must be logged in
true, fleeting-guest..
i think the russian logic and way of thinking enables students to do well in olympiads (maybe not all perfect scorers) but also be prepared for future research and harder problem solving.
the chinese way of training students it is basically based in TRAINING as a methodic, algorithmic and automatic job. and math is not just this. it is learning math. and sometimes too much olympiad training can be dangerous to matheamtics. for more on this topic visit this topic and read my first post..
http://www.artofproblemsolving.com/Forum/viewtopic.php?t=44859&postorder=asc&start=40
Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2005 7:44 pm
Display posts from previous: All Posts 1 Day 7 Days 2 Weeks 1 Month 3 Months 6 Months 1 Year Sort by: Post Time Post Subject Author Ascending Descending