AoPSWiki
Looking for a challenging geometry text? Preparing for MATHCOUNTS or the AMC exams? Check out Art of Problem Solving's Introduction to Geometry by Richard Rusczyk.

1985 AIME Problems/Problem 10

From AoPSWiki

Problem

How many of the first 1000 positive integers can be expressed in the form

\lfloor 2x \rfloor + \lfloor 4x \rfloor + \lfloor 6x \rfloor + \lfloor 8x \rfloor,

where x is a real number, and \lfloor z \rfloor denotes the greatest integer less than or equal to z?

Contents

Solution

We will be able to reach the same number of integers while x ranges from 0 to 1 as we will when x ranges from n to n + 1 for any integer n (Quick proof: \lfloor 2(n+x)\rfloor + \ldots = \lfloor 2n + 2x\rfloor + \ldots = 2n + \lfloor 2x\rfloor \ldots). Since \lfloor 2\cdot50 \rfloor + \lfloor 4\cdot50 \rfloor + \lfloor 6\cdot50 \rfloor + \lfloor 8\cdot50 \rfloor = 100 + 200 + 300 +..., the answer must be exactly 50 times the number of integers we will be able to reach as x ranges from 0 to 1, including 1 but excluding 0.

Solution 1

Noting that all of the numbers are even, we can reduce this to any real number x between 0 to \frac 12, as this will be equivalent to \frac n2 to \frac {n+1}2 for any integer n (same reasoning as above). So now we only need to test every 10 numbers; and our answer will be 100 times the number of integers we can reach between 1 and 10.

We can now approach this by directly searching for the integers (this solution) or brute forcing all of the cases (next solution):

We can match up the greatest integer functions with one of the partitions of the integer. If we let x = \frac 12 then we get the solution 10; now consider when x < \frac 12: \lfloor 2x \rfloor = 0, \lfloor 4x \rfloor \le 1, \lfloor 6x \rfloor \le 2, \lfloor 8x \rfloor \le 3. But according to this the maximum we can get is 1+2+3 = 6, so we only need to try the first 6 numbers.

  • 1: Easily possible, for example try plugging in x =\frac 18.
  • 2: Also simple, for example using \frac 16.
  • 3: The partition must either be 1+1+1 or 1+2. If \lfloor 4x \rfloor = 1, then x \ge \frac 14, but then \lfloor 8x \rfloor \ge 2; not possible; and vice versa to show that the latter partition doesn't work. So we cannot obtain 3.
  • 4: We can partition as 1+1+2, and from the previous case we see that \frac 14 works.
  • 5: We can partition as 1+2+2, from which we find that \frac 13 works.
  • 6: We can partition as 1+2+3, from which we find that \frac 38 works.

Out of these 6 cases, only 3 fails. So between 1 and 10 we can reach only the integers 1,2,4,5,6,10; hence our solution is 6 \cdot 100 = 600.

Solution 2

As we change the value of x, the value of our expression changes only when x crosses rational number of the form \frac{m}{n}, where n is divisible by 2, 4, 6 or 8. Thus, we need only see what happens at the numbers of the form \frac{m}{\textrm{gcd}(2, 4, 6, 8)} = \frac{m}{24}. This gives us 24 calculations to make; we summarize the results here:

\frac{1}{24}, \frac{2}{24} \to 0

\frac{3}{24} \to 1

\frac{4}{24}, \frac{5}{24} \to 2

\frac{6}{24}, \frac{7}{24} \to 4

\frac{8}{24} \to 5

\frac{9}{24}, \frac{10}{24}, \frac{11}{24} \to 6

\frac{12}{24}, \frac{13}{24}, \frac{14}{24} \to 10

\frac{15}{24} \to 11

\frac{16}{24},\frac{17}{24} \to 12

\frac{18}{24}, \frac{19}{24} \to 14

\frac{20}{24}\to 15

\frac{21}{24}, \frac{22}{24}, \frac{23}{24} \to16

\frac{24}{24} \to 20

Thus, we hit 12 of the first 20 integers and so we hit 50 \cdot 12 = 600 of the first 1000.

Solution 3

Recall from Hermite's Identity that \sum_{k = 0}^{n - 1}\left\lfloor x + \frac kn\right\rfloor = \lfloor nx\rfloor. Then we can rewrite \lfloor 2x \rfloor + \lfloor 4x \rfloor + \lfloor 6x \rfloor + \lfloor 8x \rfloor = 4\lfloor x\rfloor + \left\lfloor x + \fra... + \left\lfloor x + \frac38\right\rfloor + 4\left\lfloor x + \frac12\right\rfloor + \left\lfloor x + \frac58\right\rfloor + \l.... There are 12 terms here (we don't actually have to write all of it out; we can just see where there will be duplicates and subtract accordingly from 20). Starting from every integer x, we can keep adding to achieve one higher value for each of these terms, but after raising the last term, we will have raised the whole sum by 20 while only achieving 12 of those 20 values. We can conveniently shift the 1000 (since it can be achieved) to the position of the 0 so that there are only complete cycles of 20, and the answer is \frac {12}{20}\cdot1000 = \boxed{600}.

Solution 4

Imagine that we increase x from 0 to 1. At the beginning, the value of our expression is 0, at the end it is 2+4+6+8=20. How many integers between 1 and 20 did we skip? We skip some integers precisely at those points where at least two of 2x, 4x, 6x, and 8x become integers at the same time.

Obviously, for x=1/2 and x=1 all four values become integers at the same time, hence we skip three integers at each of these locations. Additionally, for x=1/4 and x=3/4 the values 4x and 8x become integers at the same time, hence we skip one integer at each of the locations.

Therefore for x\in(0,1] we skip a total of 3+3+1+1=8 integers. As in Solution 2, we conclude that we hit 12 of the integers from 1 to 20, and so we hit 50 \cdot 12 = 600 of the first 1000.

See also

1985 AIME (ProblemsResources)
Preceded by
Problem 9
Followed by
Problem 11
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Add a glimpse of the Art of Problem Solving Forum to your own site!
Click here for details!
© Copyright 2008 AoPS Incorporated. All Rights Reserved. • FoundationPrivacyContact Us