AoPSWiki
Do you have what it takes to be the next brilliant trader, researcher, or developer at Jane Street Capital? Find out in the Careers in Mathematics Forum.

2003 AMC 12B Problems/Problem 24

From AoPSWiki

Contents

Problem

Positive integers a,b, and c are chosen so that a<b<c, and the system of equations

2x + y = 2003 \quad and \quad y = |x-a| + |x-b| + |x-c|

has exactly one solution. What is the minimum value of c?

\mathrm{(A)}\ 668\qquad\mathrm{(B)}\ 669\qquad\mathrm{(C)}\ 1002\qquad\mathrm{(D)}\ 2003\qquad\mathrm{(E)}\ 2004

Solution

Step 1: Finding some promising bound

Does the system have a solution where x\leq a?

For such a solution we would have y=(a-x)+(b-x)+(c-x), hence 2x+(a+b+c-3x)=2003, which solves to x=a+b+c-2003. If we want to avoid this solution, we need to have a+b+c-2003>a, hence b+c>2003, hence c\geq 1003. In other words, if c<1003, there will always be one solution (x,y) such that x\leq a.

Step 2: Showing one solution

We will now find out whether there is a c<1003 for which (and some a,b) the system has only one solution. We already know of one such solution, so we need to make sure that no other solution appears.

Obviously, there are three more theoretically possible solutions: one x in \left(a,b\right], one in \left(b,c\right], and one in \left(c,\infty\right). The first case solves to x=2003+a-b-c, the second to 3x=2003+a+b-c, and the third to 5x=2003+a+b+c. We need to make sure that the following three conditions hold:

  1. 2003+a-b-c\not\in\left(a,b\right]
  2. \frac{2003+a+b-c}3\not\in \left(b,c\right]
  3. \frac{2003+a+b+c}5\not\in\left(c,\infty\right).

Let c=1002 and b=1001. We then have:

  1. 2003+a-b-c=a
  2. \frac{2003+a+b-c}3 = \frac{2002+a}3 \leq \frac{2002+1000}3 < 1001 = b
  3. \frac{2003+a+b+c}5 = \frac{4006+a}5 \leq \frac{4006+1006}5 < 1002 = a

Hence for c=1002, b=1001 and any valid a the system has exactly one solution (x,y)=(a,2003-2a).

Step 3: Proving the optimality of our solution

We will now show that for c<1002 the system always has a solution such that x>a. This will mean that the system has at least two solutions, and thus the solution with c=1002 is optimal.

  1. As we are looking for a c<1002, we have b+c\leq 2001, hence 2003+a-b-c > a. To make sure that the value falls outside \left(a,b\right], we need to make it larger than b, thus 2003+a-b-c > b, or equivalently 2003+a > 2b+c.
  2. The condition we just derived, 2003+a > 2b+c, can be rewritten as 2003+a+b > 3b+c, then as 2003+a+b-c > 3b, which becomes \frac{2003+a+b-c}3 > b. Thus to make sure that the second value falls outside \left(b,c\right], we need to make it larger than c. The inequality \frac{2003+a+b-c}3 > c simplifies to 2003+a+b > 4c.
  3. To avoid the last solution, we must have \frac{2003+a+b+c}5\leq c, which simplifies to 2003+a+b \leq 4c.

The last two inequalities contradict each other, thus there are no a,b,c that would satisfy both of them.

Conclusion

We just showed that whenever c<1002, the system has at least two different solutions: one with x\leq a and one with x>a.

We also showed that for c=1002 there are some a,b for which the system has exactly one solution.

Hence the optimal value of c is \boxed{\mathrm{(C)}\ 1002}.

See also

2003 AMC 12B (ProblemsResources)
Preceded by
Problem 23
Followed by
Problem 25
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Try our innovative online adaptive learning system, Alcumus.
Over 1100 problems and 60+ video lessons. FREE!
© Copyright 2008 AoPS Incorporated. All Rights Reserved. • FoundationPrivacyContact Us