AoPSWiki
Want to learn how to tackle those tough AMC/AIME/Olympiad counting and probability problems? Check out Art of Problem Solving's Intermediate Counting & Probability by David Patrick.
Personal tools

User talk:Temperal/The Problem Solver's Resource Competition

From AoPSWiki

Problem 2

I don't think the question is worded correctly. I haven't actually thought much about it yet, but a variable o is introduced and not used, and the l simply disappears from the ending condition (but the condition given is symmetric). And there are simple counter-proofs, let p = 0.1 or some other value close to 0, and then it quickly becomes apparent that the entire denominator will approach 0, and the inequality will be false. Azjps (talk) 21:49, 10 October 2007 (EDT)

Random counter-example: p = l = m = 0.1, k = 0.299833, n = 0.172916. Then the fraction becomes 111.4.
And problem 3, the same equation is given for both circles. I'm assuming you meant 9 for one of the radii? Azjps (talk) 18:33, 12 October 2007 (EDT)
You're right. I'll fix that after dinner. Temperalxy 19:01, 12 October 2007 (EDT)
Fixed. Temperalxy 14:02, 13 October 2007 (EDT)
Add a glimpse of the Art of Problem Solving Forum to your own site!
Click here for details!
© Copyright 2008 AoPS Incorporated. All Rights Reserved. • FoundationPrivacyContact Us