AoPSWiki
Our Precalculus course starts on Dec. 4. Master trig, complex numbers, and vectors and matrices in 2 and 3 dimensions. Click here to enroll today!

AoPSWiki talk:Contest Problems Standards

From AoPSWiki

Revision as of 20:38, 4 March 2007 by Azjps (Talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Current revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

In my opinion, the Olympiad Complex Numbers Problems and Olympiad Trigonometry Problems categories are not useful. First of all, problems involving strictly complex numbers or strictly trigonometry are very uncommon in olympiad problems. Second, they are practically the same. Third, most problems which focus on trigonometry and complex numbers can be classified as either geometry or algebra (or maybe occasionally number theory). And finally, I think it wise to adopt the system of IMO problem categorization, which consists only of categories for algebra, combinatorics, geometry, and number theory problems. Does anybody else have an opinion on the subject? —Boy Soprano II 17:11, 25 August 2006 (EDT)

Basically any classification scheme you can come up with for math problems is going to be flawed in some way or another. For example, there are plenty of problems that look like geometry problems that don't really have much to do with geometry at all but are in fact algebra problems. (USAMO 2002/2 springs to mind immediately.) --ComplexZeta 02:06, 26 August 2006 (EDT)

Want to learn how to tackle those tough AMC/AIME/Olympiad algebra problems? Check out Art of Problem Solving's Intermediate Algebra by Richard Rusczyk and Mathew Crawford. Over 1600 problems!
© Copyright 2008 AoPS Incorporated. All Rights Reserved. • FoundationPrivacyContact Us