AoPSWiki
Looking for a challenging geometry text? Preparing for MATHCOUNTS or the AMC exams? Check out Art of Problem Solving's Introduction to Geometry by Richard Rusczyk.

Power set

From AoPSWiki

Revision as of 21:34, 28 January 2008 by JBL (Talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Current revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

The power set of a given set S is the set \mathcal{P}(S) of all subsets of that set It is also sometimes denoted by 2^S.

Contents

Examples

The empty set has only one subset, itself. Thus \mathcal{P}(\emptyset) = \{\emptyset\}.

A set \{a\} with a single element has two subsets, the empty set and the entire set. Thus \mathcal{P}(\{a\}) = \{\emptyset, \{a\}\}.

A set \{a, b\} with two elements has four subsets, and \mathcal{P}(\{a, b\}) = \{\emptyset, \{a\}, \{b\}, \{a, b\}\}.

Similarly, for any finite set with n elements, the power set has 2^n elements.

Size Comparison

Note that for any nonnegative integer n, 2^n > n and so for any finite set S, |\mathcal P (S)| > |S| (where absolute value signs here denote the cardinality of a set). The analogous result is also true for infinite sets (and thus for all sets): for any set S, the cardinality |\mathcal P (S)| of the power set is strictly larger than the cardinality |S| of the set itself.

Proof

There is a natural injection S \hookrightarrow \mathcal P (S) taking x \mapsto \{x\}, so |S| \leq |\mathcal P(S)|. Suppose for the sake of contradiction that |S| = |\mathcal P(S)|. Then there is a bijection f: \mathcal P(S) \to S. Let T \subset S be defined by T = \{x \in S \;|\; x \not\in f(x) \}. Then T \in \mathcal P(S) and since f is a bijection, \exists y\in S \;|\; T = f(y).

Now, note that y \in T by definition if and only if y \not\in f(y), so y \in T if and only if y \not \in T. This is a clear contradiction. Thus the bijection f cannot really exist and |\mathcal P (S)| \neq |S| so |\mathcal P(S)| > |S|, as desired.


Note that this proof does not rely upon either the Continuum Hypothesis or the Axiom of Choice. It is a good example of a diagonal argument, a method pioneered by the mathematician Georg Cantor.

Size for Finite Sets

The number of elements in a power set of a set with n elements is 2^n for all finite sets. THis can be proven in a number of ways:

Method 1

Either an element in the power set can have 0 elements, one element, ... , or n elements. There are \binom{n}{0} ways to have no elements, \binom{n}{1} ways to have one element, ... , and \binom{n}{n} ways to have n elements. We add:

\binom{n}{0}+\binom{n}{1}+\cdots+\binom{n}{n}=2^n

as desired.

Method 2

We proceed with induction.

Let S be the set with n elements. If n=0, then S is the empty set. Then

P(S)=\{\emptyset \}

and has 2^0=1 element.


Now let's say that the theorem stated above is true or n=k. We shall prove it for k+1.

Let's say that Q has k+1 elements.

In set Q, if we leave element x out, there will be 2^k elements in the power set. Now we include the sets that do include x. But that's just 2^k, since we are choosing either 0 1, ... or k elements to go with x. Therefore, if there are 2^k elements in the power set of a set that has k elements, then there are 2^{k+1} elements in the power set of a set that has k+1 elements.

Therefore, the number of elements in a power set of a set with n elements is 2^n.

Method 3

We demonstrated in Method 2 that if S is the empty set, it works.

Now let's say that S has at least one element.

For an element x, it can be either in or out of a subset. Since there are n elements, and each different choice of in/out leads to a different subset, there are 2^n elements in the power sum.


See Also

External Links

Want to learn how to tackle those tough MATHCOUNTS and AMC counting and probability problems? Check out Art of Problem Solving's Introduction to Counting & Probability by David Patrick.
© Copyright 2008 AoPS Incorporated. All Rights Reserved. • FoundationPrivacyContact Us