Difference between revisions of "Talk:1995 AHSME"

(New page: There was no AMC 12 in 1995 (or in any other year before 2000) -- I think it would be much more appropriate to rename this article to 1995 AHSME, and ditto for all similar articles. Agree...)
 
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
There was no AMC 12 in 1995 (or in any other year before 2000) -- I think it would be much more appropriate to rename this article to 1995 AHSME, and ditto for all similar articles.  Agreement?  --[[User:JBL|JBL]] 14:16, 9 January 2008 (EST)
 
There was no AMC 12 in 1995 (or in any other year before 2000) -- I think it would be much more appropriate to rename this article to 1995 AHSME, and ditto for all similar articles.  Agreement?  --[[User:JBL|JBL]] 14:16, 9 January 2008 (EST)
 +
 +
I assent. --[[User:1=2|1=2]] 14:36, 9 January 2008 (EST)
 +
 +
:I had moved [[Template:Old AMC12 box]] to [[Template:AHSME box]] (oddly the former still works) and was going to make a note of the AMC vs AHSME issue, but then I decided not to because the resources section put everything under AMC 12. I agree to moving it to AHSME (I volunteer to mass move them). <font style="font-family:Georgia,sans-serif">[[User:Azjps|Azjps]] ([[User talk:Azjps|<font color="green">talk</font>]])</font> 19:49, 9 January 2008 (EST)

Latest revision as of 22:11, 9 January 2008

There was no AMC 12 in 1995 (or in any other year before 2000) -- I think it would be much more appropriate to rename this article to 1995 AHSME, and ditto for all similar articles. Agreement? --JBL 14:16, 9 January 2008 (EST)

I assent. --1=2 14:36, 9 January 2008 (EST)

I had moved Template:Old AMC12 box to Template:AHSME box (oddly the former still works) and was going to make a note of the AMC vs AHSME issue, but then I decided not to because the resources section put everything under AMC 12. I agree to moving it to AHSME (I volunteer to mass move them). Azjps (talk) 19:49, 9 January 2008 (EST)